SLINGSHOT DIGITAL. LESS NEWS. MORE CONTEXT (Fall 2024-2025). This website is refreshed with new content, design elements, and functional features approximately every seven days.
PINNED POST
California: 4th largest economy in the world
***************************************
September 2025
UNDERSTANDING THE 2025-26 CALIFORNIA BUDGET DEFICIT: A CALL FOR STRATEGIC REFORMS
The state of California is facing a significant budget deficit by the 2025-26 fiscal year, projected to reach $20 billion. This alarming shortfall stems from rising disparities in income and expenditures, necessitating immediate and strategic policy reforms. To understand the implications of this deficit, we must examine the underlying factors contributing to the fiscal imbalance, as well as the potential consequences for the state’s economy and its residents.
One of the primary drivers of California’s budget deficit is the growing income inequality within the state. As the cost of living continues to rise, many Californians are struggling to make ends meet while a small percentage of the population amasses substantial wealth. This disparity not only impacts the overall economic health of the state but also places immense pressure on public services that rely on tax revenues. The decreasing tax contributions from lower-income individuals, coupled with the limited ability of the state to effectively tax wealth, exacerbates the fiscal shortfall.
Moreover, expenditures continue to increase in key areas such as healthcare, education, and public safety, driven by both rising demand and inflationary pressures. Without proactive measures, the gap between income and necessary expenditures will widen, putting essential services at risk and jeopardizing the quality of life for millions of Californians.
Addressing the 2025-26 budget deficit requires a multifaceted approach. Policymakers must prioritize equitable tax reform that not only ensures that wealthier individuals contribute their fair share but also addresses the burdens placed on low- and middle-income families. Furthermore, investing in economic development initiatives aimed at job creation and workforce training can help bridge the income gap and stimulate economic growth.
Ultimately, the implications of failing to address the budget deficit extend beyond mere numbers. A balanced budget is critical for maintaining the integrity of vital public services and ensuring that every Californian has the opportunity to thrive. By adopting a proactive and equitable fiscal strategy, the state can work towards a budget that reflects the needs and aspirations of all its residents, fostering a more sustainable and prosperous future for California.
The impending $20 billion budget deficit is not merely a financial challenge; it is a call to action. The disparities in income and expenditures demand a comprehensive response that prioritizes equity, sustainability, and the well-being of all Californians. As stakeholders in this state’s future, we must advocate for the strategic reforms necessary to secure a stable and prosperous California for generations to come.
*******************************************
August 2025
LOS ANGELES ICE-PROTESTS 2025
UNEQUAL IMPACT: WHO REALLY BENEFITS FROM EMPLOYER SANCTIONS?
On June 6, anti-ICE protesters in Los Angeles took a definitive stance against law enforcement. The far-right narrative characterizes individuals such as Angelica Salas, the Executive Director of the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights (CHIRLA), as “Marxist lawbreakers” for their calls to action against ICE. This “Red State” perspective contends that in Democrat-controlled states like California, taxpayer resources are misallocated to indoctrinate college and high school students, fostering an environment that encourages disruptive and unlawful behavior. Furthermore, this narrative implies that such states extend a “free pass” to undocumented immigrants and facilitate legal representation for individuals residing in the country illegally. For additional insights, please refer to “Taxpayer-Funded Riots: Here is what we uncovered when we examined the financial implications in Los Angeles” on RED STATE.
It is imperative to acknowledge that the Constitution guarantees “due process” rights to all “persons”, not exclusively to citizens. This principle ensures that fair treatment under the law is extended to everyone, irrespective of their immigration status. Although it may appear that the unrest in Los Angeles has diminished, the repercussions are substantial. Reports indicate extensive looting and significant destruction, with estimated losses reaching millions of dollars. The National Guard and Marines have been deployed in response to the situation, incurring an expected cost of approximately $134 million over a projected 60-day period. Furthermore, protests and riots have emerged in various locations across the nation as the Department of Homeland Security has confirmed that ICE operations will continue without interruption.
But when will we confront the core issue of ‘illegal immigration’? The real culprits are the American employers who knowingly hire individuals without legal status, violating the law. While President Trump is addressing this issue, his focus remains on the “symptoms” rather than addressing the real “cause(s).” This is a critical problem that Congress should have resolved long ago, though they have repeatedly failed, likely due to conflicts of interest.
In his 1986 statement regarding the “Immigration Reform and Control Act”, President Ronald Reagan asserted that addressing illegal immigration requires a comprehensive strategy. He stressed that this act would “remove the incentive for illegal immigration by eliminating the job opportunities that lure illegal aliens here.” By enforcing employer sanctions, Reagan sought to dismantle the very job prospects that attract undocumented workers to the United States.
Taking action: What you can do if your employer hires undocumented immigrants
If you find evidence that your employer is hiring undocumented workers, it is essential to act, as this is illegal. Report the situation to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) by calling 1-866-DHS-2-ICE or using the online ICE Tip Form. Your action could help restore legal integrity to the labor market and protect the rights of all workers.
************************************
LOS ANGELES ICE-PROTESTS 2025
(Nathan Hochman L.A. County District Attorney)
**************************************
August 2025
THE ESCALATING CRISIS OF IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT: A CALL FOR TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY
Fears of disappearance: ICE raids create atmosphere of terror among immigrant communities in Southern California
The debates surrounding immigration enforcement in the United States have intensified, particularly in Southern California, where incidents like the reported detention of Selena Vanessa Hernandez Ramirez illuminate a troubling trend. This situation extends beyond mere policy discussions and strikes at the heart of human rights and community integrity. The case of Ramirez—a 25-year-old mother from El Salvador, apprehended by federal agents outside a Home Depot—exemplifies the often invisible yet profound impact of immigration raids on vulnerable populations.
Reports indicate that Ramirez attempted to evade detention, clinging to a tree in desperation—a vivid illustration of the fear that many immigrants experience in their daily lives. Witnesses claim that the agents involved did not identify themselves or present a warrant, raising critical questions about the legality and ethics of such encounters.
As a society that values justice and due process, we must scrutinize the actions of immigration officials that not only undermine these principles but also exacerbate community fear. The ramifications of such detentions extend far beyond the individuals involved. Ramirez’s family has reportedly lost contact with her, highlighting the emotional and psychological toll these incidents take on families and communities. The increasing prevalence of immigration raids has engendered a pervasive atmosphere of fear that stifles the openness and integration of immigrant communities into the broader social fabric.
Activists and concerned community members are rightfully demanding greater transparency and accountability regarding these operations; they should not be relegated to the shadows of governmental authority. Moreover, the current enforcement strategies disproportionately affect marginalized groups, deepening existing societal divides. By prioritizing arrests and detentions without due process, we risk fostering an environment where human rights are routinely overlooked in favor of strict enforcement. This not only detracts from the principles upon which our legal system is built but also fuels cycles of trauma and distrust within communities. In conclusion, the case of Selena Vanessa Hernandez Ramirez is a poignant reminder of the need to reevaluate our approach to immigration enforcement in the United States.
We must advocate for policies that ensure the humane treatment of all individuals, regardless of their immigration status, and call for systemic changes that promote transparency and accountability within federal agencies. By doing so, we can foster a society where justice and dignity are upheld for everyone, reflecting the values that define us as a nation.
Immigrants are not just a vital component of California’s agricultural workforce; they are the backbone of the State’s immense produce industry. It is alarming to note that a large percentage of farmworkers in California are immigrants, with many of them living in the shadows as undocumented individuals. This heavy reliance on immigrant labor raises significant ethical and social questions. How can we accept the crucial contributions of these workers while simultaneously denying them basic rights and protections? The fruit, vegetable, and nut industries thrive on their hard work, yet these workers often face exploitation and lack access to essential resources. It’s time to critically examine the system that allows this dependence on vulnerable populations and advocate for reform that ensures dignity, fairness, and respect for all individuals contributing to our food system.
***************************************
August 2025
ELECTORAL INTEGRITY UNDER SCRUTINY: CAN CALIFORNIA MAINTAIN FAIR PLAY AMIDST PARTISAN PROPOSALS?
https://gerrymander.princeton.edu/reforms/CA (Link)
The ongoing debate surrounding redistricting in California is a crucial one, as it directly impacts the integrity of our electoral process and the representation of our diverse population. Currently, California employs an independent redistricting commission, implemented through voter-approved initiatives, which has indeed ensured a fairer approach to drawing congressional and state legislative districts. However, Governor Gavin Newsom’s recent proposal for a ballot measure advocating for partisan mid-decade redistricting must be examined with a critical lens.
Proponents of this measure argue that it is a necessary counteraction against Republican gerrymandering efforts in states such as Texas, which could undermine Democratic representation at the national level. While the intention to protect Democratic seats might seem laudable, the core of democracy lies in fair play and equal representation for all citizens, irrespective of political affiliation. Introducing a partisan approach to redistricting risks sacrificing these democratic principles in favor of transient political advantages.
Additionally, the potential to redraw California’s congressional map with partisan objectives could lead to unrest and decreased public trust in the electoral process. If voters perceive that redistricting is driven by political maneuvering rather than an impartial assessment of population needs, disillusionment with the system may grow. This could ultimately galvanize support for further divisive political strategies across the spectrum, fueling a cycle of mistrust and contention. It is imperative for lawmakers to uphold the integrity established by the independent commission. By doing so, they would not only honor the will of the voters who endorsed this system but also safeguard the democratic values that underpin our governance.
The consideration of Governor Newsom’s proposal should prompt a robust discussion about the long-term consequences of altering our redistricting process. Prioritizing fair and independent redistricting, rather than partisan gains, is essential for maintaining the credibility and functionality of California’s democracy in the years to come.
**********************************************
August 2025
CALIFORNIA’S UNEMPLOYMENT RATE SURGES: STATE’S STRUGGLES MIRROR NATIONAL CONCERNS
https://www.bls.gov/web/laus/laumstrk.htm (Link)
California’s jobless rate has risen once more, positioning the state at the forefront of the nation’s unemployment figures. In June 2025, the unemployment rate in California reached 5.4 percent, tying with Nevada as the highest among all U.S. states. In contrast, the national average stood at approximately 4.1 percent. State officials attribute California’s jobless rate to a slowdown in job creation and escalating economic challenges. Employers are frequently hesitant to expand their workforce due to uncertainties surrounding tariffs, immigration policies, automation, and increasing expenses. While there were some job increases in healthcare and private education, sectors such as trade, transportation, and utilities experienced declines, particularly due to reductions in warehousing and wholesale trade. (US Bureau of Labor Statistics)
***********************************************
August 2025
Actor Dean Cain, widely celebrated for his iconic portrayal of Superman in the 1990s series “Lois & Clark: The New Adventures of Superman,” has made a bold decision to join U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Cain asserts, “This country was built on patriots stepping up, whether it was popular or not, and doing the right thing. I truly believe this is the right thing”. His commitment comes at a pivotal moment, as the Department of Homeland Security has recently eliminated the age limit for new ICE applicants and introduced enhanced benefits. (Hollywood News, Dean Cain Social Media)
ICE offers financial incentives for new recruits
The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has recently eliminated age restrictions for prospective law enforcement recruits, thereby broadening the eligibility criteria to include individuals of any age. This policy change aims to enhance the agency’s capacity to fulfill its critical role in national security while simultaneously addressing significant staffing shortages within law enforcement agencies.
ICE is actively seeking motivated candidates and is prepared to invest in their development through various financial incentives, including signing bonuses and student loan repayment options. This presents a unique opportunity for those interested in pursuing a career in law enforcement. While candidates will still need to meet essential requirements, such as undergoing medical screenings, drug tests, and physical fitness assessments, the previous age limitations no longer apply.
This policy shift welcomes applicants who may be recent graduates, those seeking career changes, or individuals passionate about law enforcement.
******************************************
August 2025
CALIFORNIA WILDFIRES: A CALL FOR COMPPREHENSIVE ACTION TO OVERCOME AN ANNUAL CRISIS
The ongoing wildfires in California serve as a stark reminder of the urgent need for a comprehensive strategy to tackle this escalating crisis. Each year, as flames engulf significant portions of land, the conversation shifts from reactive measures to the undeniable necessity of proactive planning. The historical reliance on reactive firefighting techniques has proven insufficient against the scale and intensity of these wildfires.
Despite the seasonal patterns of wildfire occurrences, the frequency and severity of these events have been exacerbated by climate change, land management practices, and urban development in fire-prone areas. This intersection of environmental factors and human activity calls for a multifaceted approach that addresses not just the fires themselves but the conditions that give rise to them.
First, there needs to be a significant investment in forest management and restoration. Thinning out dense underbrush and maintaining healthy ecosystems can mitigate the spread of fires and reduce their intensity. Furthermore, prescribed burns, although controversial, have been shown to be effective in managing fuel loads when conducted under controlled conditions. In addition, emergency response systems must be reevaluated. This includes better training for firefighters, improved technology for early detection, and more robust evacuation plans.
Communities need to be equipped with resources and knowledge to prepare for potential evacuations, as the rapid onset of wildfires often leaves residents with little time to react. Public awareness campaigns should also be a key component of any plan. Educating residents about fire risks and encouraging safe practices, such as proper landscaping and fire-resistant building materials, can help create a culture of fire safety. Lastly, fostering collaboration among federal, state, and local agencies is crucial for effective wildfire management.
Policies that integrate ecological, sociocultural, and economic considerations will facilitate a more holistic approach to wildfire prevention and response. The time to act is now. A massive, coordinated effort is necessary not only to combat the immediate threat of wildfires but also to build resilient communities capable of adapting to the realities of a changing climate. Without a paradigm shift toward proactive measures, the consequences of inaction will only become more devastating—both for the environment and for human life.
********************************************
August 2025
UCLA’s $6.13 MILLION SETTLEMENT ADDRESSES ANTISEMITISM AND LEGAL FEES
https://edsource.org/2025/ucla-settlement-antisemitism-lawsuit-trump/737571 (Link)
A World Leader in Education and Research Excellence | UCLA (Link)
WHAT HAPPENED: Under the terms of the settlement agreement, UCLA is required to guarantee that Jewish students, faculty, and staff have equal access to all campus activities and resources. The settlement, totaling $6.13 million, will cover damages and legal fees for the plaintiffs. Additionally, approximately $2.3 million from this sum will be allocated to eight organizations dedicated to fighting antisemitism, according to the university’s announcement.
The recent settlement agreement involving UCLA marks a significant development in the ongoing discourse surrounding antisemitism and equity within academic institutions. By mandating that UCLA guarantees equal access to campus activities and resources for Jewish students, faculty, and staff, the settlement emphasizes the necessity of safeguarding the rights and experiences of Jewish community members in higher education. The financial component of the settlement, totaling $6.13 million, highlights both the legal ramifications of failing to address discrimination and the pressing need for institutions to uphold their commitments to diversity and inclusion.
The allocation of approximately $2.3 million to eight organizations dedicated to combating antisemitism further underlines the proactive measures that can be taken to foster a more inclusive environment. Academically, this case could serve as a pivotal reference point for discussions on institutional responsibility, the effectiveness of legal remedies in addressing systemic bias, and the role of universities in nurturing a safe environment for all students. Ultimately, the implications of this settlement extend beyond UCLA, potentially influencing other institutions grappling with similar issues of harassment and discrimination.
******************************************
July 2025
Breaking News
KAMALA HARRIS STEPS BACK FROM CALIFORNIA POLITICS, FOCUSES ON NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC EFFORTS (Getty)
California native and Vice President , Kamala Harris, announced that she will not seek the Governor’s office in California. This decision leaves the door open for a possible bid for the White House in 2028.
“For now, my leadership–and public service–will not be in elected office. I look forward to getting back out and listening to the American people, helping elect Democrats across the nation.” (KH Statement, Social Media)
****************************************
July 2025
GOV. NEWSOM TO WATTERS: “See you in court buddy” AFTER MISREPRESENTATION ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Fox News’ Watters Apologizes Over Newsom-Trump Report; Governor Isn’t Dropping Lawsuit (Link)
WHAT HAPPENED: Jesse Watters, a host on Fox News, has acknowledged his mistake in alleging that Governor Gavin Newsom misrepresented a telephone conversation with former President Trump. Despite this admission, Governor Newsom remains resolute in his decision to pursue legal action, asserting, “See you in court, buddy.” This exchange raises significant questions regarding the standards of truthfulness in political commentary and the implications of such claims for public trust and accountability within the political sphere.
Governor Newsom files $787 million defamation lawsuit against Fox News. Fox News host Jesse Watters accused of misrepresenting Newsom’s communications with Trump
WHAT HAPPENED: On Friday morning, California Governor Gavin Newsom initiated a defamation lawsuit against Fox News, seeking $787 million in damages. This legal action arises from allegations made by Fox News host Jesse Watters, who claimed that Newsom was deceitful regarding his communication with former President Donald Trump. Specifically, Watters asserted that Trump ordered National Guard troops to Los Angeles this month and that Newsom misrepresented a phone call with Trump on a particular day in early June. In response to these claims, Newsom’s legal team contends that Watters’ program presented a misleadingly edited video of Trump to substantiate its assertions. In a tweet announcing his lawsuit, Newsom declared, “No more lies.”
The crux of the lawsuit lies in the statement made by Watters that Governor Newsom had lied about the absence of a phone call with Trump on the specified date. The damages sought by Newsom appear to directly mirror the $787 million settlement reached between Fox Corporation, Fox News, and other affiliated networks with Dominion Voting Systems in April 2023. That settlement followed a Delaware lawsuit in which Dominion accused Fox of defaming the company by perpetuating false claims that its voting machines influenced the outcome of the 2020 presidential election against Trump.
It is noteworthy that, although former President Trump has employed disparaging nicknames to refer to Governor Newsom, including “Gavin Newscum,” Newsom has chosen to file his lawsuit exclusively against Fox News. This decision may be influenced by concerns regarding the former president’s cognitive decline. Regardless of these concerns, it is reasonable to assume that either the White House or the Governor’s office retains a recorded copy of the transcript about the disputed phone call, irrespective of Trump’s current mental state. In its response to the lawsuit, Fox News issued a statement characterizing Newsom’s actions as a “transparent publicity stunt” that is frivolous and aims to inhibit free speech critical of the governor. The network indicated its intention to defend against the lawsuit vigorously and expressed confidence that the case would ultimately be dismissed. This legal confrontation not only highlights the contentious relationship between Newsom and Fox News but also raises broader questions regarding the implications of media statements on public officials and the boundaries of free speech.
***************************************
June 2025
TRANSGENDER RIGHTS IN CALIFORNIA:
AN EXAMINATION OF POLICY INITIATIVES AND ATHLETIC PARTICIPATION ISSUES
Transgender athlete wins, shares state honors, creating questions about inclusion | EdSource (Link)
ISSUE AT STAKE: The State actively champions gender-affirming care, including for minors, exemplified by the implementation of the Transgender, Gender Diverse, and Intersex (TGI) Inclusive Act. This commitment reflects a dedication to ensuring that all individuals have access to necessary healthcare and support, positioning California as a leader in promoting inclusivity and understanding.
For instance, Britain’s Supreme Court has decisively ruled that the definition of a ‘woman’ in equality legislation is based on biological sex at birth. This clear stance affirms that biological sex is paramount in understanding gender within legal contexts. In other words, they concluded that “trans-women do not fully align with the definition of women.” This perspective holds validity and prompts essential discussions about gender identity.
https://supremecourt.uk/uploads/uksc_2024_0042_judgment_aea6c48cee.pdf (Link)
ca-letter.pdf (Link)
WHAT HAPPENED: Why did President Trump turn to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) for a letter regarding transgender rights? (See the letter below) With his administration having effectively dismantled the Department of Education, one must wonder: is he transferring vital responsibilities to the USDA? This troubling shift raises significant concerns about our national priorities and the proper management of essential social and educational issues.
Trump threatens to cut California funding over transgender youth athletes | EdSource (Link)
***************************************
Insights from transgender athletes on inclusion and fairness
The discourse surrounding transgender rights in California has increasingly gained prominence within both academic and critical frameworks. This examination seeks to explore the multifaceted nature of policy initiatives aimed at promoting inclusivity and addressing the challenges faced by transgender individuals, particularly in the realm of athletic participation.
California has been at the forefront of progressive legislation regarding transgender rights, enacting policies that seek to dismantle barriers and promote equity. Legislative measures such as the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) and the School Success and Opportunity Act represent significant strides towards recognizing and protecting the rights of transgender individuals. These policies not only outline anti-discrimination protections but also provide guidelines for the inclusion of transgender students in educational environments, ensuring they can participate in sports in alignment with their gender identity. However, the intersection of transgender rights and athletic participation presents complex challenges that warrant critical examination.
The debate surrounding the eligibility of transgender athletes, particularly in competitive sports, has become contentious, often polarized by differing viewpoints on fairness, safety, and inclusivity. Critics of inclusive policies argue that allowing transgender women to compete in women’s sports undermines competitive fairness, citing concerns about physical advantages. On the other hand, advocates emphasize the importance of inclusion in fostering mental health and well-being for transgender individuals, positing that sports should be accessible to all, regardless of gender identity.
Academic studies focusing on this issue have yielded diverse findings, with research often highlighting the psychological benefits of sports participation for transgender individuals, alongside the need for equitable treatment in athletic programs. Furthermore, discussions surrounding policy implications reveal a tension between legislative intent and practical outcomes, as schools and sports organizations grapple with the implementation of inclusive policies amidst varying societal attitudes.
The landscape of transgender rights and athletic participation in California serves as a microcosm of broader societal debates about inclusion, equity, and fairness. As policies continue to evolve, it is essential for stakeholders to engage in informed, critical dialogues that consider the lived experiences of transgender individuals within the sporting context, ultimately striving for a balance that honors both inclusion and fairness in athletics.
********************************************
June 2025
PROPOSED ‘NO SECRET POLICE ACT’ AIMS TO ENHANCE ACCOUNTABILITY IN LAW ENFORCEMENT
Statement on Wearing of Masks by ICE Agents | New York City Bar Association (Link)
“The New York City Bar Association (the “City Bar”) views with alarm the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) officers’ new practice: wearing masks and otherwise obscuring their identities when conducting detentions and arrests.”
WHAT HAPPENED: Recent immigration raids conducted by agents in plain clothes, wearing face coverings and lacking visible identification, have raised significant concerns among immigrant communities and State lawmakers. State Senator Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco, articulated this concern, stating, “Law enforcement officers serve the public, and it is imperative for individuals to see their faces and know who they are. Without such transparency, we jeopardize accountability.”
In response to this pressing issue, Senator Wiener, in collaboration with Assembly Public Safety Committee Chair Jesse Arreguín, D-Oakland, is advocating for the “No Secret Police Act.” This proposed legislation seeks to prohibit officers in California from obscuring their identities with masks while on duty. Arreguín emphasized the urgency of reform, noting, “Recent observations indicate that law enforcement agents—both local and federal—are using masks that entirely hide their faces during deportation and enforcement actions. Such practices must be altered to foster public trust and ensure safety.”
*********************************
June 2025
Breaking News
2025 LOS ANGELES ICE-PROTESTS
DEMOCRACY IN QUESTION: SENATOR PADILLA’S REMOVAL FROM DHS PRESS CONFERENCE
WHAT HAPPENED: On June 12, 2025, Senator Alex Padilla was forcibly removed from a press conference organized by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in Los Angeles. The press conference featured remarks from DHS Secretary Kristi Noem concerning ongoing immigration protests in the region. During the event, Senator Padilla attempted to ask Secretary Noem questions regarding immigration raids. As he moved to approach the podium, security personnel intervened and prevented him from asking his questions. They subsequently detained him by handcuffing him and forcing him to the ground in a corridor outside the conference room. Throughout the incident, Senator Padilla inquired about the reasons for his detention, but he did not receive any explanation. In response to the situation, the DHS described Senator Padilla’s behavior as disruptive and indicated that he did not comply with requests to step back, which led security personnel to perceive him as a potential threat.
*********************************************
************************************************
June 2025
THE RISKS OF SECESSION: WHY CALIFORNIA SHOULD FOCUS ON UNITY OVER DIVISION
2025 LOS ANGELES ICE-PROTESTS
The topic of secession has long been a point of contention within political discourse, particularly in a state as diverse and economically significant as California. Advocates for secession cite a variety of reasons, including political disenfranchisement and differing cultural values within the state. However, a closer examination of the implications of secession reveals significant risks that may ultimately outweigh the perceived benefits.
Firstly, the economic ramifications of secession cannot be underestimated. California is a leading economic powerhouse, contributing heavily to both the national GDP and the global economy. Secession could lead to a loss of federal funding, which supports various state programs from infrastructure to education. The potential isolation that arises from secession could also jeopardize trade relationships and economic cooperation with the rest of the United States and indeed the world. This would not only affect state income but also the livelihoods of millions of Californians who rely on stable economic conditions.
The social and political implications of secession are equally concerning. A divided state may exacerbate existing tensions among communities and encourage fragmentation rather than fostering collaboration on pressing issues such as climate change, healthcare, and housing. Unity is often a catalyst for progressive change; maintaining a cohesive political stance may allow Californians to work collectively towards solutions that benefit all demographics, rather than seeing a further divide that could polarize opinions and actions. Culturally, California is a melting pot of diverse populations and ideologies. Secession could lead to the marginalization of certain groups, undermining the principles of inclusivity and representation that are central to California’s identity. A focus on unity can promote dialogue and understanding among varying communities, fostering a collective approach to governance that recognizes and respects the rich tapestry of Californian society.
The historical context of secession, particularly in the United States, offers valuable lessons. Secession movements have often led to conflict, instability, and prolonged periods of strife. The legacy of the Civil War serves as a poignant reminder of the detrimental effects of division. The risks involved in pursuing a path of secession could foster discord, not just within California but across the nation, potentially prompting other states to consider similar actions.
While the idea of secession may appeal to a subset of Californians seeking autonomy or a voice for their concerns, the broader implications present significant risks. Prioritizing unity over division is essential for California’s long-term stability and prosperity. Collaborative efforts that engage all citizens, regardless of ideology or background, will better serve the state and its diverse population than a path fraught with uncertainty and conflict. Emphasizing dialogue, inclusivity, and cooperation can harness the strength of California’s diversity to address the challenges faced both within the state and in the wider context of national issues.
Newsom calls special session to ‘Trump-proof’ California – CalMatters (Link)
What if California contemplated secession from the United States? Such a decision would likely lead to more challenges than advantages, potentially resulting in unnecessary tensions. Rather than pursuing this divisive path, Californians should concentrate on strategies to fortify their state and ensure its resilience against changing political climates.
WHEREVER PRESIDENT TRUMP IS PRESENT, THERE APPEARS TO BE A NOTABLE TENDENCY FOR INSURRECTION TO OCCUR
******************************************
June 2025
LOS ANGELES ICE-PROTESTS 2025:
MAYOR KAREN BASS ANNOUNCES 8 P.M. TO 6 A.M. CURFEW FOR PUBLIC SAFETY
WHAT HAPPENED: Mayor Karen Bass of Los Angeles has announced the implementation of a curfew, which will be enforced from 8 p.m. to 6 a.m. local time in designated areas of the city. This decision follows several days of demonstrations protesting the immigration policies of the Trump administration. The curfew is projected to remain in effect for several days, reflecting the necessity of maintaining order and public safety during this period of heightened unrest.
What is a curfew?
A curfew is a regulation that requires individuals to remain indoors during specified nighttime hours. It may be enforced by parents, law enforcement agencies, or governmental authorities, functioning as an essential mechanism for preserving community safety and order. (The Office of Mayor Karen Bass)
**********************************
National Guard Troops Deployed to Los Angeles: Estimated Costs Reach $134 Million
WHAT HAPPENED: Bryn Woollacott MacDonnell is currently serving as the Special Assistant to the Secretary of Defense and is also acting as the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) and Chief Financial Officer. She said that deploying National Guard troops and Marines to Los Angeles amidst immigration-enforcement protests will incur an estimated cost of about $134 million. This figure predominantly reflects the necessary housing, travel, and meal expenses for the personnel involved.
*****************************************
THE INSURRECTION ACT (1807):
TURNING (LOS ANGELES’) CITIZENS INTO INSURGENTS IN THE NAME OF ORDER (2025)
WHAT HAPPENED: Established in 1807, the Insurrection Act empowers the President of the United States with the critical authority to deploy military forces to combat domestic unrest, including insurrections and rebellions. When state or federal laws face obstruction or become unenforceable, this act enables prompt action. By facilitating the deployment of the National Guard and federal armed forces, the Insurrection Act ensures that order can be restored swiftly and that our laws are upheld effectively.
While President Trump has not yet formally invoked the Insurrection Act regarding the protests in Los Angeles, he has taken decisive action by signing a Presidential Proclamation that mobilizes 2,000 National Guard personnel. This response demonstrates a commitment to maintaining order and reflects the exercising of presidential authority grounded in both established constitutional principles and the relevant statutes under 10 U.S.C. 12406.
TRUMP’S POV: “It (will) depend on whether or not there’s an insurrection.” “The people who are causing the problems are bad people, they are insurrectionists.” (Source: The White House)
*****************************************
It’s time for America to take notice. President Trump has made the bold decision to override Governor Newsom’s authority and deploy the National Guard to confront civilians
Californians are taking a stand against ICE raids. In a troubling response to the rising immigration protests, President Trump intends to send 2,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles. Governor Newsom stated that this move is “purposefully inflammatory and will only escalate tensions.”
WHAT HAPPENED: The recent announcement by President Trump to deploy 2,000 California National Guard troops to Los Angeles in response to ongoing immigration protests raises important concerns that deserve our attention. While the government’s intention to maintain order is understandable, we must carefully consider the implications of utilizing military forces in civilian law enforcement, especially in light of the Posse Comitatus Act.
This legislation was enacted to protect our democratic principles and ensure that the military does not overreach into civilian affairs. The restrictions placed by the Posse Comitatus Act are crucial in preventing the potential misuse of power and preserving the fundamental rights of citizens. Activating the National Guard for federal service should not be taken lightly and should only occur under specific circumstances that genuinely warrant such drastic measures. By relying on military presence to manage protests, we risk escalating tensions rather than finding peaceful resolutions. Instead of deploying troops, we should be investing in dialogues and fostering community engagement to address the root causes of these protests.
There are more effective alternatives that prioritize safety and respect for civil liberties, options that build bridges rather than walls between the government and its citizens. Let us advocate for solutions that uphold our values and respect the law. The deployment of the National Guard should be a last resort, and we must demand accountability and transparency from our leaders regarding the measures they choose to implement in the face of civil unrest. Together, we can seek out approaches that promote understanding, unity, and the protection of our democratic rights.
GOV. NEWSOM’S POV: “The federal government is moving to take over the California National Guard and deploy 2,000 soldiers. That move is purposefully inflammatory and will only escalate tensions. LA authorities are able to access law enforcement assistance at a moment’s notice. We are in close coordination with the city and county, and there is currently no unmet need. The Guard has been admirably serving LA throughout recovery. This is the wrong mission and will erode public trust.” (Twitter, June 7, 2025)
The Insurrection Act of 1807 provides a crucial statutory exception to the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, allowing for necessary federal intervention during times of civil unrest
WHAT HAPPENED: Established in 1807, the Insurrection Act empowers the President of the United States with the critical authority to deploy military forces to combat domestic unrest, including insurrections and rebellions. When state or federal laws face obstruction or become unenforceable, this act enables prompt action to be taken. By facilitating the deployment of the National Guard and federal armed forces, the Insurrection Act ensures that order can be restored swiftly and that our laws are upheld effectively.
****************************************
LOS ANGELES ICE-PROTESTS 2025
PROTESTS: THE BACKBONE OF OUR DEMOCRACY (YOUR VOICE MATTERS)
We strongly oppose the National Guard’s deployment that undermines Governor Newsom’s authority. Instead, we call on Southern Californians to stay calm, engage in peaceful protests, and stay informed about their rights during demonstrations. And while we firmly reject violence, we wholeheartedly support peaceful expressions of dissent. It is crucial that peaceful protestors on U.S. soil show respect for the American flag, regardless of whether they are Mexicans, Jews, Palestinians, or any other immigrant group that has embraced the U.S. as their new home. Immigrants have a storied history of fighting and sacrificing for this nation. They have served valiantly in the U.S. military since the country’s inception, making significant contributions in major conflicts, including the Civil War, the World Wars, and recent military operations in the Middle East.
In the United States, the act of burning the flag is safeguarded by the First Amendment as a powerful form of symbolic speech, as affirmed by the Supreme Court. The pivotal case Texas v. Johnson (1989) reinforced the idea that flag burning is a legitimate form of political protest and expression. This vital ruling ensures that the government cannot suppress flag burning unless it genuinely threatens public safety or disrupts the peace, thus protecting our fundamental right to express dissenting views through this symbolic act.
****************************************
April 2025
CALIFORNIA FACES GROWING CONCERNS OVER WATER DROUGHT AND RESERVOIR DECLINE
The pressing question is whether the Trump Administration will offer the necessary support to address these critical issues or contribute to their escalation.
Although water drought and declining reservoir levels are not the sole critical challenges facing the State, they remain a significant issue of concern in California. It is imperative that these matters be addressed with careful consideration.
ISSUE AT STAKE: President Trump contends that the delta smelt, a small, endangered fish, exemplifies the excessive environmental regulations that hinder vital water deliveries. Also, he argues that a hypothetical “valve” or “faucet” in Northern California could be used to divert water southward to Los Angeles. However, experts have criticized this notion, pointing out that no such infrastructure exists to connect those water resources directly to Los Angeles. In his efforts to address water shortages, the Trump administration ordered water releases from dams in California’s Central Valley. Unfortunately, these actions led to flooding in agricultural areas and raised alarms about the potential waste of water needed for the dry season. Trump claimed these releases were aimed at combating the fires in Los Angeles. Yet, experts clarified that the water systems did not reach the fire-affected locations, and ample water was already available in the local vicinity. This situation underscores the need for a more informed and practical approach to managing California’s water resources.
How does the case of the delta smelt exemplify the tensions between environmental protection laws and agricultural water use in California?
2. In what ways can political narratives about water management, such as those presented by President Trump, influence public perception and policy decisions regarding environmental resources?
3. What role do scientific expertise and ecological assessments play in informing policy decisions about water resource management, particularly in the context of climate change and natural disasters like wildfires?
**************************************
April 2025
HOLLYWOOD’S RESILIENCE: DEBUNKING TRUMP’S DOOM AND GLOOM NARRATIVE
WHAT HAPPENED: Donald Trump has stated that the American movie industry is “dying a swift death,” but this claim overlooks the industry’s complexities and ongoing evolution. It is essential to evaluate whether there is merit to his argument or if the reality is more complex and multifaceted than suggested.
If Hollywood tariffs are implemented, consumer costs are likely to increase, resulting in higher ticket prices and higher streaming fees. Initially, studios may absorb the financial impact of these tariffs. It is anticipated that they will subsequently transfer these increased costs to audiences through price hikes. This transition could significantly restrict access to international films for numerous viewers, thereby narrowing the diversity of cinematic offerings.
Governor Gavin Newsom has proposed a significant enhancement to California’s Film and Television Tax Credit Program, increasing its funding from $330 million to $750 million annually. This strategic initiative seeks to position California as the premier state for film incentives, thereby attracting a greater number of productions and fostering economic growth within the industry.
*************************************
January-March 2025
THE ONE THING TRUMP GOT RIGHT. CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL: THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM
WHAT HAPPENED: U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy has issued a stern warning to halt all federal funding for California’s high-speed rail project, labeling it a “boondoggle” with no clear path ahead. He pointed to a troubling history of delays, mismanagement, waste, and soaring costs tied to this initiative, which has already burdened taxpayers with around $6.9 billion in expenses without a single mile of track being laid. It’s time to reassess the viability of this project and prioritize responsible investment of taxpayers’ money.
ISSUE AT STAKE: California’s high-speed rail project, designed to link vital population centers like San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Sacramento, is an essential initiative that must overcome several hurdles. Despite significant progress in building the initial Central Valley segment, the journey to completion remains daunting. To realize this transformative vision, we must address critical funding gaps, manage cost overruns effectively, and advocate for continued federal support. Investing in this project is not just about infrastructure; it’s about ensuring a sustainable and connected future for all Californians.
**********************************
January-March 2025
CALIFORNIA’S STATE BUDGET (2025-26): A PROJECTED $12 BILLION DEFICIT
WHAT HAPPENED: California’s State budget proposal (Office of Governor Gavin Newsom 2025-2026): $321.9 billion, with a projected $12 billion deficit. The revised budget includes projected reductions in payroll expenditures, impacting state operations. California faces a significant challenge with high living costs and a persistent poverty rate that is among the highest in the nation.
Newsom: California faces a $12 billion budget deficit (Link)
***********************************
January-March 2025
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 2025: THE DEVASTATING WILDFIRES WERE SPARKED BY HUMAN ACTIONS
In 2025, The Palisades and Eaton Fires burned over 57,000 acres, destroyed more than 18,000 buildings, and caused at least 30 deaths.
“The fires around Los Angeles were the result of the dangerous overlap of multiple human and natural influences. The fire ignitions were human-caused—like virtually all winter fires in the area—although the exact trigger remains under investigation.”
What started the LA wildfires? – Miyamoto International (Link)
Arson has emerged as one of the most rapidly increasing crimes in America, demanding our urgent attention and action.
California’s New Arson Law – A Weapon for the War on Arson | Office of Justice Programs (Link
Inaugural Articles: Archived, Slingshot Digital Magazine, Fall 2024-2025
Copyright 2017-2026 ©Havah House Co. Policy Terms: the content of this website is a work of authorship and an intellectual property of Havah House Co. No portion of its content may be performed, reproduced, or used by any means, or disclosed to, quoted, or published in any medium without the consent of the owner.