E-MAIL: info (at) havahhouseco (dot) com
WEBSITE | www.havahhouseco.com
SLING TALK SHOW | Social Media Platform(s): YouTube and BlueSky (Link Below)
https://www.youtube.com/@TALKSHOWSLINGSHOT (Link)
(BLUESKY) https://bsky.app/profile/havahhouseco.bsky.social (Link)
When Everyone’s an Expert: The Rise of Social Media “Fact-Checking”
In examining the landscape of social media platforms, it is noteworthy that Twitter has established its “Community Notes” feature as the sole mechanism for user-driven fact-checking. As of early 2025, Meta, the parent organization of both Facebook and Instagram, initiated the implementation of a comparable crowdsourced model within the United States, subsequently dismantling its third-party fact-checking program in that region. This shift raises critical questions about the efficacy and reliability of user-generated content in addressing misinformation across these platforms. The lack of a “Community Notes” feature or any robust fact-checking system on Truth Social raises significant concerns about the spread of misinformation. By prioritizing “free expression” and limiting moderation, the platform seems to neglect its responsibility to users, who may encounter false or misleading information without any reliable means of verification. While the option to block or mute undesirable content allows users some level of control, it doesn’t address the broader issue of misinformation being circulated unchecked. This approach could ultimately compromise the integrity of discussions and the quality of information shared on the platform, leaving users to navigate a landscape that may be rife with inaccuracies.
“Stay Safer on Social Media” (Link Below)
https://rainn.org/strategies-to-reduce-risk-increase-safety/stay-safer-on-social-media
Social media has become a thriving marketplace for sexual and violent content, all thanks to algorithms that glorify sensationalism and predators who shamelessly exploit these platforms for their malicious aims. It’s fascinating how the very outlets designed to connect us are instead serving up a buffet of trauma, desensitization, and increased aggression, especially for impressionable young users. The mix of real and shockingly crafted media ensures that a majority of teens are not just passive witnesses to violence, but are marinating in it. And let’s not forget the rise of online sexual violence, with “sextortion” becoming the latest trend.
Social media platforms like Instagram and Facebook, owned by Meta, proudly tout their policies against violence and adult content. However, enforcing these guidelines sometimes seems almost like a game of Whack-a-Mole. Users cleverly navigate around automated systems and human moderators, effortlessly exposing themselves and others, including minors, to an alarming amount of graphic and explicit content. Despite their self-proclaimed commitment to safety, Meta has found itself in hot water, facing waves of criticism for their hit-or-miss enforcement. It’s almost as if their policies are merely decorative, existing in theory rather than practice.
The incident involving Instagram in early 2025 raises significant concerns about content moderation and user safety on social media platforms. The exposure of users, especially minors, to graphic and inappropriate material highlights critical failures in the platform’s algorithm and oversight. Such glitches not only undermine user trust but also pose potential psychological risks to younger audiences who are unprepared for such content. The responsibility lies not just on the platform but also on regulatory bodies to ensure stricter guidelines and accountability for how content is managed and filtered, particularly for vulnerable users. This situation calls for an urgent reevaluation of content security measures and increased transparency from social media companies regarding their content handling practices.
The situation with Meta is deeply concerning and raises serious questions about accountability in the tech industry. Despite having internal documents that alert them to the dangers their platforms pose to children, including exposure to harmful content, cyberbullying, and contact with online predators, the company continues to operate with minimal transparency and seemingly little regard for player safety. The numerous lawsuits filed by parents of affected teens and young adults highlight a systemic issue: the contention that Meta’s platforms are designed to be addictive, prioritizing engagement over user safety. It’s alarming that a company can be aware of such risks yet choose not to take adequate measures to protect vulnerable users. This raises ethical concerns about their responsibility to provide a safe environment, especially for minors who may not fully understand the implications of their online interactions.
Furthermore, Twitter’s new policy on “consensually produced” adult content may seem like a relaxed approach to freedom of expression, but it raises several critical concerns. While the intent to formalize guidelines for nudity and pornography could suggest a step towards more openness, the reality is far more complicated.
First, labeling adult content as “consensually produced” does not necessarily address the potential issues of exploitation or the blurred lines of consent in the adult industry. There are significant risks involved, especially for vulnerable individuals who may not fully understand the implications of sharing such content online.
The requirement for content warnings and restrictions for minors feels more like a token gesture than a robust solution. The effectiveness of these measures depends on users adhering to the rules, and given the vastness of Twitter as a platform, it is questionable how well this will be enforced. Additionally, by allowing adult content more freely on the platform, Twitter might inadvertently foster a climate that could lead to more harassment or negative behavior towards users who engage with or produce such content.
Ultimately, while the formalization of this policy could be seen as a step toward greater acceptance of adult content in online spaces, it risks oversimplifying complex issues related to consent, safety, and user experiences. The potential for exploitation and harm may overshadow the intended benefits of this update.
Truth Social’s journey to the Google Play Store is a fascinating case study in modern moderation—one that highlights the delicate balance between free speech and responsible content management. The irony here is palpable: an app designed to amplify voices needed a nudge to ensure those voices weren’t calling for violence or making physical threats. Perhaps it was a lesson in how even those championing what they see as “truth” must reckon with the realities of maintaining a civil forum in an increasingly polarized digital landscape. In the end, it seems Truth Social’s admission—that stronger moderation policies were necessary—could be seen not just as a reluctant concession, but as a reminder that the battle for free speech often goes hand-in-hand with the need to protect users from their own worst impulses.
HAVAH HOUSE Co.
Copyright 2017-2026 ©Havah House Co. Policy Terms: the content of this website is a work of authorship and an intellectual property of Havah House Co. No portion of this content may be performed, reproduced, or used by any means, or disclosed to, quoted, or published in any medium without the consent of the owner.