SLINGSHOT DIGITAL, LESS NEWS. MORE CONTEXT (Fall 2024-2025). This website is refreshed with new content, design elements, and functional features approximately every seven days.
PINNED POST
Sweet Peace, where dost thou dwell? I humbly crave,
Let me once know, I sought thee in a secret cave,
And ask’d, if Peace were there. (A Poem by George Herbert)
*******************************************
August 2025 | Trump’s Tariffs
PRESIDENT TRUMP LABELS FALKLAND ISLANDS AS “WORST OFFENDER”
Images: Getty
The recent imposition of a 42% tariff on goods exported from the Falkland Islands to the United States represents a significant challenge for this British overseas territory, particularly in the context of its economy, which is heavily reliant on fisheries. The characterization of the Falkland Islands as one of the “worst offenders” by former President Donald Trump warrants critical examination, given the potential economic ramifications for a small community that does not possess the international leverage of larger economies.
Trade policies and tariff rates have profound effects on local economies and individual livelihoods, and the Falkland Islands are no exception. With the imposition of such high tariffs, Teslyn Barkman, a representative of the Falkland Islands parliament, has rightfully expressed concerns over the potential detriment to local businesses and fish exports, which are vital for sustaining the region’s economic health. These tariffs threaten to disrupt established trade relationships and could lead to a decrease in export volumes, directly impacting local fisheries and, by extension, the entire economy.
It is commendable that the Falkland Islands government has chosen to refrain from imposing retaliatory tariffs in response to these measures. This decision underscores the importance of maintaining a cooperative and constructive relationship with the United Kingdom, a crucial ally and partner for trade. Instead of engaging in tit-for-tat tariffs that could escalate tensions, a more effective approach would involve diplomatic channels to address trade grievances, fostering dialogue aimed at reaching equitable solutions.
The situation of the Falkland Islands serves as a poignant reminder of the intricate dynamics of international trade and the responsibilities that accompany such policies. Policymakers must consider the broader economic implications of their decisions, particularly for smaller economies that lack the resilience to absorb the shocks imposed by unilateral trade measures. Supporting the American Continent/the Falkland Islands in navigating these challenges not only aligns with principles of fairness in global trade but also promotes sustainable economic development in regions that are often overlooked in the discourse on international economic policy.
********************************************
August 2025
ARGENTINA’S POLITICAL LANDSCAPE HEATS UP: MILEI’S CAMPAIGN CHALLENGES AND ALLEGATIONS OF MISCONDUCT
Image: AFP
In the lead-up to two critical elections, President Javier Milei and members of his Libertarian Party, La Libertad Avanza, recently organized a rally aimed at mobilizing voter support. However, the event in Lomas de Zamora, a suburb of Buenos Aires, was abruptly disrupted when protesters confronted him, launching small rocks, bottles, and other objects at his vehicle.
This incident underscores the intense political climate in Argentina, reflecting the deep divisions that characterize the current electoral landscape. Moreover, in a robust defense of his political stance, President Milei addressed allegations leveled by his opponents regarding potential improprieties involving his sister and other close associates. These allegations suggest that they may have benefited from a bribery scheme tied to the country’s disability agency.
****************************************
August 2025 | Alaska Summit
BEYOND THE HEADLINES: CAN TRUMP AND PUTIN DELIVER ON PEACE AMIDST SKEPTICISM?
The meeting between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska in August 2025 is a vital opportunity to enhance global stability and address the urgent conflict in Ukraine. Both leaders must seize this moment for peace and progress.
The scheduled meeting between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska in August 2025 holds significant implications for global stability, particularly concerning the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. As the first encounter since Trump’s second term began, this summit presents a crucial opportunity for both leaders to engage in meaningful dialogue aimed at de-escalating tensions and finding a pathway to peace. Critically, the choice of location—Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage—is both strategic and symbolic. Alaska serves as a geographical bridge between North America and Asia, underscoring the global dimensions of the Ukraine crisis.
This meeting is not merely an event but a potential turning point in international relations, offering both leaders a platform to demonstrate their commitment to resolving one of the most pressing conflicts of our time. However, skepticism naturally arises regarding the efficacy of such high-profile meetings. Historically, face-to-face discussions between world leaders have yielded mixed results. For instance, previous summits have often been characterized by grandstanding rather than concrete action. Critics might argue that without genuine commitment from both sides, this meeting could similarly fall flat, serving only as a public relations exercise rather than a genuine effort for peace. Yet, we must acknowledge that opportunities for dialogue should not be dismissed out of hand.
The complexities of the Ukrainian conflict demand sustained engagement from world leaders. A successful outcome hinges on both Trump and Putin’s willingness to prioritize diplomacy over display. For Trump, this meeting could solidify his foreign policy legacy; for Putin, a clear path towards negotiation could alleviate mounting international pressure and restore some measure of credibility on the global stage.
The August 2025 meeting is a pivotal moment for international diplomacy. It requires careful scrutiny but also an open mind to the possibilities it may unleash. As citizens of a globally interconnected world, we must advocate for productive dialogue while holding our leaders accountable for meaningful action toward a resolution in Ukraine. The stakes are high, and this meeting could either pave the way for resolution or deepen the divisions that currently plague international relations. Let us hope it leans toward the former.
“PLAY IT AGAIN, SAM”
*******************************
August 2025| Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
VOICES OF DISSENT: ISRAELI SOLDIERS CHALLENGE THE JUSTIFICATION FOR CONTINUED FIGHTING
WHAT HAPPENED: Recent reports indicate a troubling trend among Israeli soldiers, both conscripts and reservists, who are increasingly expressing reluctance or outright refusal to serve in the ongoing conflict in Gaza. This hesitation stems from profound concerns regarding the ethical implications of military actions, particularly regarding civilian casualties and the destruction of Palestinian property. Many soldiers are questioning the justifications for their deployment, with some arguing that the government may be prolonging the conflict for political gain, ultimately putting soldiers’ lives at risk and undermining efforts to secure the well-being of hostages held by Hamas.
Moreover, the extended service of numerous reservists is contributing to significant physical and mental strain, leading to exhaustion that can impair their performance and morale. It is crucial to understand that these soldiers’ frustrations also stem from a perceived lack of clear military objectives. This ambiguity fosters a sense of futility regarding their actions in Gaza, which can erode the commitment and resolve of troops. As such, it is imperative for military and political leaders to address these concerns transparently and provide a coherent strategy for the conflict.
Acknowledging the voices of soldiers is essential not only for maintaining morale but also for fostering a more principled approach to military engagement in Gaza. Only by aligning military actions with ethical standards and clear objectives can we hope to restore confidence among those tasked with safeguarding both their nation and the lives of civilians caught in the crossfire. (Haaretz, The Times of Israel)
************************************
The situation in Gaza has reached a critical humanitarian crisis, marked by several alarming factors:
- Food Insecurity: With nearly 500,000 individuals facing the threat of famine, ongoing conflict and crumbling infrastructure have made food aid a lifeline for survival.
- Healthcare Breakdown: The healthcare system is in a state of collapse, with only half of Gaza’s hospitals operating at a limited capacity due to extensive damage and staff shortages.
- Water Shortages: The region is grappling with severe water scarcity, coupled with poor hygiene conditions that heighten the risk of disease outbreaks.
- Challenges in Aid Delivery: The delivery of essential aid is hampered by damaged infrastructure and ongoing security threats, preventing help from reaching the most vulnerable. This crisis is urgent and requires immediate action and attention from the international community. (United Nations)
Craft your headline and take action: Is it possible to achieve peace between Islamism and Judaism? Can Jews and Palestinians truly share the Holy Land? Consider this compelling headline: “Paths to peace: Uncovering avenues for Israeli-Palestinian (Middle East) coexistence in the Holy Land.” This invites us to explore the potential for a harmonious future together.
ISSUE AT STAKE: The quest for true peace between Islamism and Judaism, as well as the possibility of Jews and Palestinians coexisting harmoniously in the Holy Land, is a highly complex and multifaceted issue that merits thoughtful exploration. While a significant number of individuals and groups express skepticism regarding the feasibility of such coexistence—citing longstanding historical tensions and extremist viewpoints prevalent on both sides—there is a compelling argument for the potential of collaboration and a brighter, unified future.
The role of religion in this conflict is undeniably significant, particularly concerning the contested sacred sites in Jerusalem and the conflicting territorial claims that have fueled discord for decades. Yet it is critical to recognize that political factors often underpin these tensions, suggesting that the complex interplay of political ambitions, historical grievances, and social dynamics extends beyond mere religious differences. Experts in conflict resolution contend that achieving lasting peace is improbable without transformative shifts in the foundational beliefs and leadership structures on each side. According to data from the Pew Research Center, a concerning reality emerges: only 21% of Israeli adults currently believe that a Palestinian state can peacefully coexist alongside Israel, indicating a decline in optimism compared to previous years. This statistic serves as a poignant reminder of the urgent need to build trust between communities and address the contentious status of Jerusalem, a focal point that many Israelis identify as a fundamental barrier to peace.
Despite the considerable challenges that exist, there are inspiring initiatives and efforts underway aimed at fostering coexistence and healing. Organizations such as the Alliance for Middle East Peace (ALLMEP) actively work to create connections between Israeli and Palestinian communities through innovative initiatives designed to promote collaboration and enhance mutual understanding. These efforts encompass a wide range of activities, including educational programs, dialogue forums, and community-building projects, all aimed at bridging divides and nurturing reconciliation. Ultimately, while the path to peace is fraught with difficulties, it is vital to emphasize that a harmonious future remains within reach. By fostering an environment of dialogue, education, and mutual respect, we can unlock new possibilities for coexistence, demonstrating that both communities can thrive together in the rich tapestry of the Holy Land.
*********************************************
“This is the ‘dirty work’ Israel is doing for all of us” (German Chancellor Friedrich Merz )
https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-858086 (Link)
Who would have imagined: Germany and Israel united in purpose
WHAT HAPPENED: At the G7 summit in Canada, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz publicly backed Israel’s operations against Iran during an interview with ZDF. He remarked, “Israel is undertaking a significant and challenging mission on behalf of all of us. I hold the Israeli army and leadership in the highest regard for their courage and resolve in carrying out this essential action.”
********************************************
The “Iron Dome” in Israel plays a crucial role in safeguarding lives by effectively intercepting short-range rockets, artillery shells, and mortars
Infographics Reuters
WHAT HAPPENED: The Iron Dome is a revolutionary Israeli mobile air defense system, expertly engineered to intercept and neutralize short-range rockets and artillery shells launched from distances of up to 70 kilometers. Its advanced technology goes beyond just countering rockets; it effectively targets a wide range of aerial threats, including aircraft, drones, tactical ballistic missiles, and cruise missiles.
*****************************************
August 2025
HAMAS CRITICIZES ISRAEL’S GAZA EXPANSION PLANS AMID HOSTAGE NEGOTIATION
Hamas says Israel choosing to ‘sacrifice’ hostages with Gaza City takeover | The Times of Israel (Link)
“This action will do nothing to bring an end to this conflict or to help secure the release of the hostages. It will only bring more bloodshed”, stated the UK Prime Minister. Additionally, Germany has decided to suspend arms exports to Israel until further notice in response to plans regarding Gaza City. Friedrich Merz indicated that this suspension pertains to any weaponry that could potentially be utilized in Gaza. Former President Donald Trump remarked that it is “primarily up to Israel” to determine whether to fully occupy Gaza. Meanwhile, Washington’s Ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, stated that Netanyahu’s plans for Gaza are not a concern for the United States. “It is not our responsibility to direct what they should or should not do. Certainly, if they seek wisdom, guidance, or advice, the president would likely extend it. However, the ultimate decision rests solely with the Israelis.” (The White House)
Two-State solution: Can formal acknowledgment of Palestine foster dialogue?
WHAT HAPPENED: Recently, France, the U.K., Canada, and Malta declared their intention to recognize Palestine as a State in September, prompting a critical evaluation of the international community’s response to the long-standing Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This situation, which has persisted for nearly 80 years, raises essential questions regarding the impact of such recognitions on the ground. These nations hope their decision will pressure both Israel and Palestine to engage in dialogue towards a two-State solution. However, it is vital to assess whether formally acknowledging Palestine will bridge gaps or exacerbate polarization between the two sides.
The intricacies of historical grievances, territorial disagreements, and the diverse dynamics within the region complicate the chances for peace. Furthermore, the potential effects of global acknowledgment on Palestine’s pursuit of statehood, along with Israeli security concerns, require in-depth analysis. This scenario not only prompts a reflection on the effectiveness of international diplomacy in resolving entrenched conflicts but also raises important considerations about the consequences of unilateral decisions made by nations in their political strategies.
**************************************
July 2025
ARE THE IMAGES DEPICTING STARVATION IN GAZA GENUINE OR ARE THEY (HAMAS’) PROPAGANDA?
Image by WHO (World Health Organization)
https://news.un.org/en/story/2025/07/1165517 (Link United Nations)
The humanitarian situation in Gaza has reached alarming levels, as the region grapples with a critical hunger crisis characterized by widespread food insecurity and severe famine-like conditions. Disturbing images and videos depicting emaciated children and individuals desperately searching for food have emerged, drawing significant public attention and concern.
However, skepticism surrounds the authenticity of some of these visuals. Israeli officials have raised doubts, suggesting that some images may be part of a deliberate disinformation campaign designed to create a distorted narrative around the conditions in Gaza. This debate over the validity of the visuals adds another layer of complexity to an already desperate humanitarian situation.
The ongoing crisis in Gaza has brought forth a haunting array of images depicting extreme hunger and suffering. These photos are not just disturbing visuals; they represent the harsh reality faced by countless individuals in a war-torn area where access to basic necessities is severely limited. However, some critics argue that these images may be part of a propaganda effort, designed to garner sympathy and support for a particular narrative.
It is essential to approach this topic with empathy and a critical eye. While propaganda does exist in various forms, the suffering depicted in these photos cannot simply be dismissed as fabricated rhetoric. The humanitarian crisis is real, and the plight of innocent civilians caught in the crossfire is a concern that transcends political affiliations.
Understanding the context is crucial. In times of conflict, resources become scarce, and families are often caught in desperate situations. It is not uncommon for such dire conditions to be documented and shared as a means of raising awareness. Dismissing these images outright as propaganda undermines the very real experiences of individuals enduring unimaginable hardship.
Instead of questioning the authenticity of these visuals, we should focus on how we can help and advocate for those in need. Acknowledging the gravity of the situation allows for a more profound dialogue about humanitarian aid, conflict resolution, and the importance of preserving human dignity in the face of adversity. While it’s important to remain vigilant against misinformation, we must also recognize the genuine suffering portrayed in many of these images. By fostering compassion and understanding, we can contribute to a more informed discussion about the complex realities of the situation in Gaza.
******************************************
July 2025
POLITICAL DRAMA IN BRAZIL: TRUMP CALLS FOR HALT TO INVESTIGATIONS AGAINST BOLSONARO, THREATENS BRAZIL WITH 50% TARIFF AMID POLITICAL TENSIONS
WHAT HAPPENED: US President Donald Trump issued a stern warning to Brazil, proposing a staggering 50% tariff that would take effect on August 1. This bold threat was conveyed in a letter directed to President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, which he shared on Truth Social. Trump accused Lula of engaging in a “Witch Hunt that must end IMMEDIATELY!” regarding the charges against former President Jair Bolsonaro, known for his close ties to Trump. Bolsonaro is now facing trial for allegedly attempting to orchestrate a coup against Lula, adding further tension to the already strained political landscape. (Source: Truth Social)
*****************************************
June 2025
Breaking News
U.S. MILITARY ACTIONS CHALLENGE IRAN’S NUCLEAR ASPIRATIONS AND REGIME STABILITY
The latest on Iran: The situation in Iran is increasingly alarming—Iran’s enriched uranium is unaccounted for, raising alarming questions. The Iranian government is on high alert, arresting anyone they suspect of treason or ties to Israel. Moreover, US military actions have not only destabilized Iran’s regime but also significantly hindered its nuclear ambitions. It’s crucial to understand the implications of these developments. (Via AP, Reuters, BBC)
Iran’s strategic attack on Al Udeid: A potential path to de-escalation?
WHAT HAPPENED: In a bold move, Iran announced that its missile attack on Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar was intentionally calibrated to correspond with the number of bombs the United States dropped on its nuclear sites over the weekend. This strategic decision indicates Iran’s commitment to de-escalation in light of the tense geopolitical climate. (via AP, United Arab Emirates)
Evaluating Iran’s counterattack strategies
- Iran’s relentless focus on targeting Israel is a multifaceted issue that warrants attention and thoughtful analysis.
- The potential for strikes against U.S. military installations in the region appears increasingly imminent, reflecting a strategic calculus that seeks to expand Iran’s influence and assert its position in geopolitical conflicts.
- The alarming amplification of terrorist networks, both within the U.S., Iran, and on an international scale, represents a multifaceted threat that cannot be overlooked. As these networks gain strength and resources, they pose significant risks not only to regional stability but also to global security. It is imperative that policymakers acknowledge and address these developments proactively, as the consequences of inaction could lead to dramatic escalations and widespread ramifications.
- Iran has recently emphasized the possibility of closing the Strait of Hormuz, a strategically essential chokepoint for global oil transportation, in response to actions taken by the United States. This strait plays a pivotal role in the international energy market, as a significant portion of the world’s oil supply passes through it. The potential closure of this maritime route would not only disrupt oil shipments and increase global oil prices significantly but also heighten geopolitical tensions in the region. Such a drastic measure would serve as a clear indication of Iran’s determination to safeguard its interests and respond to perceived threats, underscoring the delicate balance of power in international relations and the critical need for diplomatic engagement to ensure stability in this vital area.
Calls for Dialogue: Addressing Systemic Oppression in Post-Revolution Iran
WHAT HAPPENED: A wide range of international organizations and human rights advocates have voiced serious concerns about the human rights abuses occurring under the Khomeini regime in Iran. These issues demand urgent attention and action. In the aftermath of the 1979 Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini and his regime launched a campaign of systematic oppression against homosexuals. Khomeini’s rationale for this violence was disturbingly clear; he equated gay individuals to gangrene, asserting that they posed a threat to the moral fabric of society by “contaminating others.” Such justifications reveal a deeply harmful ideology that not only dehumanizes individuals but also promotes an environment of fear and persecution. Following the Iranian Revolution, the Khomeini regime dramatically undermined women’s rights and freedoms, leading to systemic oppression. This tragic shift included the repeal of vital protections under the Family Protection Law, the enforcement of mandatory hijab laws, and significant limitations on women’s access to education and their participation in various professional fields. These actions not only violate fundamental human rights but also hinder societal progress. (Image: Public domain)
U.S. LAUNCHES SUCCESSFUL STRIKES AGAINST IRANIAN NUCLEAR SITES, SAYS TRUMP
The Times of Israel | News from Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World (Link)
President Donald Trump declared Saturday that U.S. warplanes successfully targeted three key nuclear sites in Iran, asserting that the operation was a significant achievement for national security.
Iran’s Nuclear Program: How should the international community address Iran’s pursuit of nuclear capabilities, and what strategies would be most effective in ensuring regional security?
U.S. Foreign Policy: How has U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East influenced the region’s stability, and what changes, if any, should be made going forward?
The Rise of Extremism: What are the root causes of extremism in the Middle East, and how can countries effectively counter radicalization?
ISSUE AT STAKE: Iran has not been demonstrated to possess nuclear weapons. While Iran operates a nuclear program, both the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the U.S. government confirm that the country lacks a functional nuclear weapon design and an effective detonation system. Furthermore, Iran has committed to international treaties that explicitly reject the possession of weapons of mass destruction, reinforcing its stance against such arms.
****************************************
(IRAN BEFORE 1979) THE ERA OF MOHAMMAD REZA PAHLAVI: MODERNIZATION AND ITS CONSEQUENCES
WHAT HAPPENED: Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, the final Shah of Iran, reigned from 1941 until his ouster in the 1979 Iranian Revolution. Known simply as “the Shah,” his leadership is notable for ambitious modernization initiatives that aimed to propel Iran into the modern era. However, these efforts were undermined by escalating political repression, which fueled widespread resentment among the populace. This discontent ultimately led to his dramatic downfall, serving as a powerful reminder of the importance of balancing progress with freedom.
The Shah implemented crucial reforms that advanced gender equality, notably by granting women the right to vote, which facilitated their increasing participation in the workforce. The enactment of the Family Protection Act further enhanced women’s rights by allowing divorce and prohibiting marriage under the age of 15. Additionally, the Shah took a decisive step by banning the hijab, contending that it constrained women’s freedoms. During this pivotal period, social interactions between men and women became more integrated, and education was emphasized for the entire populace.
The Shah’s government fostered the development of new colleges, universities, and libraries, significantly enriching Iran’s educational landscape. By providing free secondary education and extending financial support to university students, the regime laid the groundwork for a more informed and egalitarian society.
To what extent did President Carter’s policies represent a betrayal of the Shah of Iran, and what implications did this have for U.S.-Iran relations?
The Blogs: Carter:The President Who Betrayed Shah to Khomeini | Erfan Fard | The Times of Israel (Link)
***************************************
June 2025
NATO UNDER SCRUTINY: IS THE ALLIANCE READY FOR MODERN CHALLENGES?
NATO – Event: 2025 NATO Summit in The Hague, 24-Jun.-2025 (Link)
ISSUE AT STAKE: The world is witnessing a myriad of complex security challenges, from evolving cyber threats and climate change to geopolitical tensions and authoritarian resurgence. These issues compel us to reflect on whether NATO continues to fulfill its foundational purpose of collective defense and the promotion of democratic values among member states.
The upcoming summit serves not only as a forum for dialogue and decision-making among allied nations but also as an opportunity to reassess the strategic priorities of the alliance in light of these emerging threats. Discussions at this summit will focus on strengthening military capabilities, enhancing interoperability among forces, and fostering unity in the face of potential aggressors, thereby reaffirming NATO’s commitment to safeguarding peace and stability. It is crucial to engage with these questions and ideas, as the effectiveness of NATO in addressing both traditional and non-traditional security threats will shape the future of international relations. Therefore, understanding NATO’s current role and its strategic adaptations is essential for evaluating its ongoing significance in an increasingly complex world. (Source: Nato Official Website)
**********************************************
June 2025
D-Day
(Military Term: “Day-of-decision”)
On this D-Day anniversary, let us reflect on the incredible bravery of the soldiers who courageously stormed the beaches of Normandy on June 6, 1944. Their selflessness and valor not only liberated nations but also ensured freedom for future generations. We honor their enduring legacy, which continues to motivate and inspire us all.
WHAT HAPPENED: The German Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s command of English exceeds President Trump’s German, highlighting the significance of effective communication. This meeting promotes an engaging dialogue that gets straight to the point, with Merz clearly and directly articulating his thoughts.
********************************************
June-May 2025
CANADA BECAME AN INDEPENDENT STATE WITHIN THE BRITISH COMMONWEALTH IN 1931, MARKING A SIGNIFICANT STEP IN ITS JOURNEY TOWARD SOVEREIGNTY
WHAT HAPPENED: King Charles’ visit to Canada and his message to the world: Canada proudly became an independent state within the British Commonwealth in 1931, marking a significant step in its journey toward sovereignty. In 1949, the modern Commonwealth was established with the London Declaration, and Canada has played a vital role in its growth and influence worldwide. (Image Kate Peters)
Canada is at a critical juncture in its political landscape with Mark Carney stepping in as the new Prime Minister. His appointment comes at a time when the nation faces numerous challenges, from economic recovery post-pandemic to climate change and social inequality.
Carney’s experience as a prominent central banker gives him a unique perspective on managing economic stability, but we must critically evaluate whether he can translate that experience into effective policy-making. Supporters may argue that Carney’s expertise positions him to navigate complex financial landscapes and mitigate risks that threaten Canada’s economy. His global reputation can attract investment and steer Canada towards sustainable growth. However, we must also inquire: Can he balance economic recovery with the urgent need for progressive social reforms?
It’s essential to question whether his leadership style will foster unity within a diverse and often divided country. The key to Carney’s success will not just be in addressing numbers but in connecting with the Canadian populace across various demographics. It’s vital for him to prioritize transparency and inclusivity, ensuring that marginalized voices are heard in the decision-making process. It’s not just about who leads, but about how they lead and who benefits from their leadership. With the right focus on progressive change and equality, Canada can thrive under Carney’s leadership—but that is a promise that must be earned through action, not just words. (Op-ed)
************************************************
“CANADA IS NOT FOR SALE” (PM Carney), “NEVER SAY NEVER” (President Trump)
WHAT HAPPENED: Canada depends on the U.S. market for about 75% of its exports. This significant reliance is a crucial factor in discussions surrounding trade agreements and their potential economic impacts.
TRUMP’S POV: President Trump continued to emphasize emphatically, ‘never say never’. The current administration is operating under a highly strategic leadership–the ‘Hostile Takeover Regime.’ This approach focuses on clearly defined objectives in both domestic and foreign affairs, with an emphasis on the implementation and monitoring of ‘Project 2025,’ a 900-page ultra-conservative framework published by The Heritage Foundation. According to CNN, over 140 individuals who previously worked for the Trump Administration are involved in shaping this political initiative. “Never say never”—highlighting a lack of principles, an embrace of fear and uncertainty, and a departure from peace of mind and a clear conscience.
CARNEY’S POV: Canadian Prime Minister, Mark Carney, emphasized that “Canada is not for sale.” President Trump remarked, “It’s hard to justify subsidizing Canada to the tune of maybe $200 billion a year,” implying that the U.S. is essentially giving Canada money. This claim is inaccurate; in reality, as trade partners, there are years when the U.S. exports more to Canada and other years when it imports more. Typically, President Trump fails to clarify these details and often confuses or misrepresents the facts. He seems to mistakenly equate a “trade deficit” with “subsidizing.” For instance, the U.S. trade deficit with Canada in 2024 was reported to be $63.3 billion, according to the U.S. Trade Representative’s Office. Furthermore, Kush Desai, Deputy Press Secretary at The White House, stated, “Canadian companies won’t have to worry at all about tariffs when Canada becomes our cherished 51st State.”
LIGHT AT THE END OF THE TUNNEL: With the emergence of new leadership in the U.S., the world is confronting significant challenges, including economic hardships and political instability. However, they are responding to these by promoting unprecedented international cooperation, despite the backdrop of U.S. political isolationism and policy volatility. Emerging powers like China, India, and countries in Eastern Europe are actively challenging the (new) established order. China’s influence in Central and South America is growing rapidly, while Western European nations are increasingly focused on building connections among themselves as more reliable partners. While each of us is a unique talent, it is crucial to recognize that the U.S. is not irreplaceable. (The White House)
*************************************************
May 2025
“(MEXICO) SOVEREIGNTY IS NOT FOR SALE. SOVEREIGNTY IS LOVED AND DEFENDED (President Sheinbaum)
Image: Official Instagram
WHAT HAPPENED: President Trump offered military assistance to Mexico to help combat the cartels. Mexican cartels are highly organized criminal organizations, particularly known for their involvement in drug trafficking. They typically operate with a hierarchical structure, featuring strong leadership and a network of enforcers. Several major cartels dominate the Mexican drug trade, including the Sinaloa Cartel, the Jalisco New Generation Cartel (CJNG), and the Gulf Cartel. These cartels engage in turf wars to control territories and often corrupt local and state authorities through bribery and intimidation.
TRUMP’S POV: On Air Force One, President Trump remarked, “She’s a lovely woman (Mexico’s President), but she’s so afraid of the cartels that she cannot think straight.” The current administration is operating under a highly strategic leadership–the ‘Hostile Takeover Regime.’ This approach focuses on clearly defined objectives in both domestic and foreign affairs, with an emphasis on the implementation and monitoring of ‘Project 2025,’ a 900-page ultra-conservative framework published by The Heritage Foundation. According to CNN, over 140 individuals who previously worked for the Trump Administration are involved in shaping this political initiative. As President Trump stated in a recent interview, “Never say never”—highlighting a lack of principles, an embrace of fear and uncertainty, and a departure from peace of mind and a clear conscience.
SHEINBAUM’S POV: President Sheinbaum insists on living a “principled life,” even if it means facing criticism from Trump. She stated, “Mexico’s sovereignty is not for sale. We will never accept the presence of the United States military in our territory.” On Air Force One, President Trump remarked, “She’s a lovely woman, but she’s so afraid of the cartels that she cannot think straight.” It’s true that she is lovely and likely apprehensive about the cartels. However, it’s also accurate that President Trump never claimed that “members of his Cabinet aren’t thinking straight.” Mexico has the right to maintain control over its own affairs. If this offer had come from any other U.S. President, it’s likely that President Sheinbaum would have accepted it. However, (probably) because President Trump is unreasonably disrespectful and excessively divisive, she chose to walk away from what could have been an advantageous deal. Her message is clear: in this situation, she believes it is better to engage with the cartels than to deal with him (and them). Who could blame her for contemplating the unthinkable?
LIGHT AT THE END OF THE TUNNEL: With the emergence of new leadership in the U.S., the world is confronting significant challenges, including economic hardships and political instability. However, they are responding to these by promoting unprecedented international cooperation, despite the backdrop of U.S. political isolationism and policy volatility. Emerging powers like China, India, and countries in Eastern Europe are actively challenging the (new) established order. China’s influence in Central and South America is growing rapidly, while Western European nations are increasingly focused on building connections among themselves as more reliable partners. While each of us is a unique talent, it is crucial to recognize that the U.S. is not irreplaceable.
*****************************************************
January-April 2025
WELCOME TO THE AGE OF STEALTHY CONFLICT. CHINA HAS INTRODUCED A MINIATURE SPY DRONE DESIGNED TO MIMIC A MOSQUITO, REVOLUTIONIZING SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY
Image: Getty
The emergence of advanced surveillance technologies marks a significant turning point in modern conflict and security dynamics. The recent introduction of a miniature spy drone by China, ingeniously designed to mimic a mosquito, exemplifies this transformative shift.
As we navigate the complexities of contemporary geopolitics, it is crucial to recognize the implications of such stealthy technologies on our understanding of warfare and international relations. This miniature drone not only revolutionizes surveillance capabilities but also challenges conventional notions of security. Its inconspicuous design allows for unprecedented levels of covert operations, raising critical ethical and strategic questions. The ability to gather intelligence without detection could alter the balance of power, as nations harness these innovations to gain strategic advantages over adversaries.
The integration of such technology poses significant risks to privacy and civil liberties. As states increasingly adopt these surveillance tools, a vital discussion must be had regarding regulation and oversight to ensure the responsible use of power. The implications of adopting stealthy conflict technologies reach beyond military applications; they permeate societal norms and challenge the existing frameworks surrounding human rights and personal freedoms.
China’s miniature spy drone not only represents a remarkable feat of engineering but also underscores the necessity for a comprehensive discourse on the implications of stealthy conflict in the modern world. Understanding and addressing these challenges is essential for shaping a future where technology serves as a bridge towards peace and security, not a tool for oppression and conflict.
********************************************
**********************************************
January-April 2025
GEOSTRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS: EVALUATING NORTH KOREA’S FUTURE IN A MULTIPOLAR WORLD
Image: Getty
WHAT HAPPENED: North Korea, formally recognized as the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK), is an influential state in East Asia, occupying the northern portion of the Korean Peninsula. It shares its northern borders with China and Russia, while its southern border is contiguous with South Korea. The capital city, Pyongyang, is notable for its dynamic atmosphere and serves as the political and cultural epicenter of the nation, which has an estimated population of approximately 26.4 million individuals. Under the leadership of Kim Jong Un, North Korea functions as a totalitarian regime governed by a communist regime. The Workers’ Party of Korea wields centralized authority, guiding state policy through the Juche ideology, which emphasizes self-reliance and promotes a strong national identity. Furthermore, the government’s Songun policy prioritizes military affairs, reflecting the country’s unwavering commitment to maintaining a formidable defense and ensuring its sovereignty and security within an increasingly complex geopolitical landscape.
1. Political Evolution: How might North Korea’s political landscape change in the coming years? Will there be any shifts in leadership or government structure?
2. International Relations: How will North Korea’s relationships with key nations, such as the United States, China, and South Korea, evolve in the near future? What factors will influence these relations?
3. Economic Development: What strategies might North Korea adopt to overcome its economic challenges? Could there be a potential shift toward more market-oriented reforms?
4. Human Rights: Will there be any improvements in human rights conditions in North Korea in the future? What external or internal pressures could contribute to such changes?
5. Nuclear Policy: How will North Korea’s nuclear policy change in response to international pressures and negotiations? Will there be any steps toward denuclearization?
6. Social Change: As information becomes more accessible, how will the North Korean populace’s perspective on governance and societal norms evolve over time?
7. Environmental Issues: How will North Korea address environmental challenges, especially regarding sustainable development and resource management?
8. Technology and Innovation: What role will technology and digital innovation play in North Korea’s future, and how might this impact its economy and society?
9. Cultural Exchange: Will there be an increase in cultural exchanges with other countries, and how might this affect North Korea’s global perception?
10. Military Strategy: How will North Korea adapt its military strategy in response to changes in regional dynamics and global security challenges?
Inaugural Articles: Archived, Slingshot Digital Magazine, Fall 2024-2025
Copyright 2017-2026 ©Havah House Co. Policy Terms: the content of this website is a work of authorship and an intellectual property of Havah House Co. No portion of this content may be performed, reproduced, or used by any means, or disclosed to, quoted, or published in any medium without the consent of the owner.