LESS NEWS. MORE CONTEXT. LESS NEWS. MORE CONTEXT. LESS NEWS. MORE CONTEXT.
SLING NEWS SURVEY
Should Tyler Robinson receive the death penalty if he is convicted of murdering Charlie Kirk?
Random Sample: 30 California College Students (UCLA, Stanford, UC Merced, UC Berkeley)
No= 25 Yes= 1 Not Sure= 4
**********************************
ALL WRONGDOING WILL BE JUDGED BY GOD: FORGIVENESS DOES NOT REMOVE CONSEQUENCES
Romans 12:19 teaches Christians to leave vengeance to God, trusting him for justice instead of seeking personal revenge. Believers are called to overcome evil with good, love their enemies, and forgive, reflecting Christ.
“LOVE ALL, TRUST A FEW, DO WRONG TO NONE.” (William Shakespeare)
*********************************
SLING NEWS SURVEY
Should Tyler Robinson receive the death penalty if he is convicted of murdering Charlie Kirk?
Random Sample: 30 California College Students
(UCLA, Stanford, UC Merced, UC Berkeley) No=25 Yes=1 Not Sure=4
PRE-TRIAL INSIGHTS: THE CASE OF CHARLIE KIRK vs. TYLER ROBINSON – COLLEGE STUDENTS REFLECT ON THE DEATH PENALTY DEBATE
SLING NEWS: The survey conducted among college students in California regarding the death penalty provides valuable insights into contemporary attitudes toward capital punishment, especially in light of the case involving Tyler Robinson and the alleged murder of Charlie Kirk. With a sample size of just 30 participants, the findings indicate significant opposition to the death penalty, with 25 students expressing disapproval.
SLING NEWS: This overwhelming majority contrasts sharply with the single supporter of capital punishment in the group, while four students remained undecided. It is important to acknowledge the limitations of this survey, particularly its small sample size, which may not accurately represent the broader demographic of college students throughout California. Additionally, the timing of the survey—conducted during the pre-trial phase—adds complexity to the results.
SLING NEWS: Public opinion on high-profile legal cases can be heavily influenced by media portrayals and changing societal attitudes, which may evolve as the trial progresses. The intention to revisit this topic with further data collection after the trial of Charlie Kirk versus Tyler Robinson reflects a thoughtful approach to understanding how the unfolding circumstances may impact public sentiment. This longitudinal perspective will provide a more comprehensive view of the factors influencing students’ opinions on the death penalty.
SLING NEWS: As results from subsequent surveys become available, it will be crucial to analyze any changes in opinion and discuss the implications for both the legal system and societal values surrounding capital punishment. By continuing this dialogue, we can cultivate a deeper understanding of the complex moral and ethical considerations involved in such significant legal matters.
Watch California college students respond to whether Tyler Robison should receive a death sentence if convicted of murdering Charlie Kirk
TYLER ROBINSON, 22 YEARS OLD, AWAITING TRIAL FOR THE MURDER OF CHARLIE KIRK
Trial Date: Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing was postponed until January 16, 2026, and his arraignment will follow on January 30.
Location: Housed in the highest security unit (SHU) in Utah.
Isolation Measures:
– Designed specifically for serious offenses.
– Rigorous monitoring of daily activities, including sleeping and eating habits.
– Meals delivered through secure slots to reduce inmate interaction.
Cell Conditions:
– Dimensions: approximately 6×10 or 8×10 feet; no windows.
– Basic facilities include bolted sinks and toilets, designed to prevent self-harm.
Inmate Restrictions:
– Complete segregation from the general population.
– No access to communal recreation areas.
– Limited to six books from approved providers.
Legal Counsel Rights:
– Allowed to consult legal counsel, but meetings are under strict regulations.
– Consultations occur in designated rooms with glass separations, using telephones for communication.
DOES UTAH ALLOW THE DEATH PENALTY? Yes
SLING NEWS: Utah’s continued reliance on the death penalty is a concerning issue that warrants critical examination. With a history steeped in capital punishment since statehood, Utah stands among the 27 states that still endorse this controversial practice. While over 50 inmates have faced execution in the past, the diminishing rate of executions in recent decades raises important questions about the ethics and effectiveness of the death penalty. Since the U.S. Supreme Court reinstated capital punishment in 1976, Utah has executed a mere seven individuals, highlighting a trend of decreasing reliance on this extreme measure. This shift suggests a growing recognition of the flaws within the system—including the potential for wrongful convictions, the disproportionate impact on marginalized communities, and the moral implications of state-sanctioned death. (Source: Utah, KUTV, Utah Capital Punishment Laws by Lyle Therese A. Hilotin-Lee, J.D. | Legally Reviewed by FindLaw Staff | Last reviewed December 04, 2024, Utah Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice-gov.)
VOICES FOR JUSTICE: STEPHEN F. ROHDE ON THE IMPACTS OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT
SLING NEWS: The death penalty stands as a relic of a past era, representing the cruelty and barbarity that many of us have long sought to move beyond. When reflecting on its implications, we cannot ignore voices like that of Stephen F. Rohde, who articulately highlights the profound issues surrounding capital punishment. His memories of the trial of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg serve as a poignant reminder of the profound impact that such judgments can have on society, particularly on impressionable minds. Our nation was founded on the principles enshrined in the Constitution, which emphasize fairness, equality, and the rejection of cruel and unusual punishment. By continuing to support the death penalty, we are not only contradicting these fundamental values but also perpetuating a cycle of violence and injustice. It is time we commit ourselves to a justice system that embodies mercy and rehabilitation rather than one that resorts to vengeance and brutality. Abolishing the death penalty is not just a legal reform; it is a moral imperative that reflects our highest ideals as a society. Embracing a more humane approach to justice means honoring our principles and ensuring that our legal system truly serves all individuals with dignity and respect.
Watch the complete interview with Stephen F. Rohde here:
Slingshot Digital Magazine – Fall 2024-2025
Copyright 2017-2026 ©Havah House Co. Policy Terms: the content of this website is a work of authorship and an intellectual property of Havah House Co. No portion of its content may be performed, reproduced, or used by any means, or disclosed to, quoted, or published in any medium without the consent of the owner.