SLINGSHOT DIGITAL, LESS NEWS. MORE CONTEXT (Fall 2024-2025). This website is refreshed with new content, design elements, and functional features approximately every seven days.
“If I enter Laconia, I will raze Sparta.” (Philip II of Macedon). “If.” (The Spartans)
Farmers and politicians in Colonial America, such as Thomas Jefferson and James Monroe, were involved in the institution of slavery, even though some gradually sought to promote abolitionist initiatives. It’s worth considering: Is your iPhone produced through the exploitation of child labor or through the use of forced labor in China?
OCTOBER 26, 1823
“America, North and South, has a set of interests distinct from those of Europe, and peculiarly her own. She should therefore have a system of her own, separate and apart from Europe. Its object is to introduce and to establish the American System, of keeping out of our land all foreign powers, of never permitting those of Europe to intermeddle with the affairs of our Nations. It is to maintain our own principle, not to depart from it. I could honestly therefore join in declaration proposed that we aim not the acquisition of any of those possessions, that we will not stand in the way of any amicable arrangement between them and the mother country, but that we will oppose with all our means, the forcible interposition of any other power, as auxiliary, stipendiary, or under any other form or pretext and most essentially their transfer to any power by conquest, cession, or acquisition in any other way. I add the assurance of my constant and affectionate friendship and respect.”
President Thomas Jefferson’s letter to President James Monroe
PRESIDENT THOMAS JEFFERSON: THE FATHER OF AMERICAN ARCHAEOLOGY: Thomas Jefferson is widely considered the first North American archaeologist, as he conducted one of the first documented scientific excavations of a Native American burial mound in Virginia, which set a precedent for systematic archaeological practices in the United States; this is why he is often called the “Father of American Archaeology.”
Op-ed (August)
August 2025
Matter-of-Opinion
Subject: “A Divine Reminder, Mr. President”
Dear Mr. President,
According to a recent interview (FoxNews), it seems you’re on a quest for the ultimate destination, “Heaven—if possible.” Quite the aspiration. Perhaps you’re hoping to catch a ride with the “King of all Gods,” Yeshua–Jesus The Christ–the one and only Prophet who boasts the miraculous feat of “Resurrection”. After all, Buddha, Islamic, Vedic prophets, and others were merely mortals by comparison, right?
According to the Scripture, it’s amusing how some believe that sporting a “cross necklace”, reciting “karma mantras”, or flooding Instagram with Bible verses equates to true faith (in something). A forehead tattoo and colorful bracelets might grab attention, but the real challenge lies in living by the Scriptures: don’t commit adultery, don’t kill, don’t lie, don’t steal, honor your parents, and love God and your neighbor above all else and so on. But hey, who needs those pesky morals when you can just look the part?
So, if “heaven” is truly your goal, perhaps a little introspection and action are in order beyond the outward show.
Best wishes,
The Editor
Op-ed (July)
July 2025
Matter-of-Fact
Subject: “Education in jeopardy: The impact of federal delays on California’s students and programs”
The impact of the Trump administration’s actions on California’s education budget cannot be overstated. The federal freeze and delayed release of vital education funds put our schools and students in a precarious position. With nearly $800 million allocated for California schools withheld, essential programs were jeopardized, impacting after-school initiatives, migrant education, and services for English learners—services that are critical to fostering equity in education.
Although the amount withheld constituted less than 1% of California’s overall education budget, it’s essential to understand the significance of those funds. These were not just numbers on a spreadsheet; they represented livelihoods, commitments to staff, and promises made to our students and families. The significance of education cannot be measured solely in dollar amounts; it affects the very foundation of our society and the opportunities available to our youth.
California’s response—a lawsuit against the Trump administration—was not merely a legal step; it was a statement about the value we place on education and the rights of our students. We demanded accountability from the federal government and defended the integrity of our educational commitments.
The partial release of $1.3 billion in mid-July, including $158 million for California, was a move in the right direction, but it shouldn’t have taken a legal battle to access funds that had already been approved by Congress. The subsequent full restoration of nearly $939 million by early August should serve as a reminder of the importance of advocating for our educational institutions.
In a time when every penny counts, we must remember that our students deserve unwavering support. They are our future, and we must ensure that they have access to the resources necessary for a quality education. We must remain vigilant and continue to hold leadership accountable to prioritize the education of every child, regardless of the political climate.
The Editor
Op-ed (June)
June 2025
Matter-of-Fact
Subject: “Urgent Call to Denounce Sexual Predators”
Ghislaine Maxwell’s 2021 conviction for sex trafficking highlights the urgent need for justice in combating exploitation. As a key enabler in Jeffrey Epstein’s network, her actions were pivotal in the abuse of vulnerable girls, prompting a call for accountability for both her and those who support such predators. It’s crucial for parents and communities to remain vigilant against both “lone wolf” and “couple” sexual predators, who often exploit their relationships to target victims. Accomplices—including coworkers and family—must also be held responsible for enabling these behaviors. Research shows that many offenders are in relationships, providing them with opportunities to harm others. Individuals should document any stalking incidents and gather evidence against suspected predators. Openly condemning such behaviors is vital for raising awareness and protecting potential victims. Subject: “The Accomplices of the Epstein-Maxwell Case“: Several individuals, including Sarah Kellen, Lesley Groff, and Adriana Ross, have been identified as accomplices to Maxwell and Epstein. Their roles have been documented in court filings and the Justice Department’s extensive records may reveal more about their involvement.
The Editor
Op-ed (May)
May 2025
Matter-of-Fact
Subject: “Sustainable Presence or Environmental Hazard? The Dilemma of Lunar Colonization”
By 2030, NASA is set to introduce a lunar nuclear reactor that promises to revolutionize power generation for lunar outposts and exploratory missions. This development is crucial, given the undeniable limitations of solar energy, especially for continuous operations on the lunar surface where sunlight is not always available. Moreover, the urgency of this project is heightened by growing advancements from nations like China and Russia, who are similarly investing in nuclear energy solutions for their lunar programs.
One of the most pressing challenges of this initiative is the management of spent nuclear fuel on the Moon. There are significant concerns about the potential for contaminating the lunar environment and the inherent risks of transporting hazardous materials back to Earth. While entombing reactors under the lunar regolith offers a pathway to alleviate radiation safety concerns, it simultaneously raises important questions about long-term storage options and the environmental impact on the Moon’s fragile ecosystem.
To establish a sustainable human presence on the Moon and beyond, it is imperative that we thoroughly address these risks and challenges. The path forward requires not only innovative engineering solutions but also a careful consideration of the ethical and environmental implications of our actions in space. Embracing this responsibility is essential for the future of lunar exploration and the preservation of extraterrestrial environments.
The Editor
Op-ed (April)
April 2025
The dangerous rhetoric of political discourse: Examining Trump’s language (“Virtual Lynching”)
The behavior exhibited by President Trump in his public communications, particularly on social media and during press conferences, raises significant concerns regarding the overall tone and civility of political discourse in the United States. One might argue that his confrontational approach, characterized by derogatory language and the frequent use of capital letters for emphasis, resembles what some have termed “Virtual Lynching”—a form of intimidation directed at his opponents.
Recently, there was a startling incident where President Trump used an explicit expletive while publicly expressing his frustration over issues related to Israel and Iran. This incident not only reflects his personal frustrations but also exemplifies a larger trend toward the normalization of aggressive and foul language within the political arena. Such behavior poses the risk of diluting the standards of professionalism and decorum that have historically been expected from public officials, particularly from the highest office in the land. By frequently resorting to tantrums and intemperate rhetoric, the President appears to be setting a dangerous precedent that may influence the expectations surrounding political discourse.
As citizens, we must critically evaluate the implications of this trend and recognize its potential to undermine civilized debate and respectful communication in politics. It is imperative that we not only take note of these concerning developments but also actively condemn and reject such conduct, regardless of where it originates. This is especially crucial when it comes to the President of the United States, whose actions and speech serve as a model for behavior within the broader political landscape. Maintaining a standard of respectful and thoughtful discourse is essential to the health of our democratic institutions and the fabric of our society.
The Editor
Op-ed (March)
March 2025 Matter-of-Opinion, Matter-of-Fact
Subject: “The challenge of reversing presidential policies: A look at consequences and governance”
Dear Editor,
As we approach the election of a new President (2-0-2-8), a pertinent question arises: to what extent can the next President effectively reverse “everything” or “almost everything” that President Trump has instituted in regard to his policies? This inquiry invites a deeper exploration of the mechanisms of executive power and the long-standing impacts of such policies on the fabric of our governance. The implications of this potential reversal deserve careful examination, as they could significantly shape the direction of our nation’s future.
Yours Faithfully,
Naked & Curious
Dear Naked & Curious,
Imagine a scenario where you unintentionally run over five people, and they tragically die. In court, you claim it was an unfortunate accident, supported by eyewitnesses who corroborate your story. You were driving at twilight around 7 PM, and these individuals were lying on the road attempting to take their own lives. Unfortunately, by the time you noticed them, it was too late to stop. Let’s say you’re acquitted of all charges. Despite this, those five lives are gone, and their families are left grieving and blaming you, even suing for “reckless driving”. This example demonstrates that a new President has the ability to reverse many of the policies of a previous administration. However, it is often complex and unlikely to undo everything due to the established processes and checks and balances within the U.S. government.
Once certain actions are taken, like the loss of life in this case, the damage is irreversible.
Yours Faithfully,
The Editor
Op-ed (February)
February 2025 “Tariff threats, fiscal reforms, mass deportations, and territorial expansion are all occurring simultaneously. President Trump’s second term is characterized by heightened tensions and relentless challenges”
In today’s polarized environment, it’s crucial that we re-evaluate how we engage in discourse. Instead of viewing those with differing views as “enemies,” we must strive to treat them as “opponents,” fostering a culture of respect and understanding. This fundamental shift can pave the way for more productive conversations and reveal the potential for growth within each of us. Recent statements from leaders, such as President Trump, demonstrate a troubling trend where falsehoods are used as weapons against those who challenge their narratives. This not only distorts reality but undermines the very foundation of our democratic discourse by attempting to delegitimize valid opposition. It’s vital that we hold leaders accountable, recognizing that truth and transparency are the pillars of a healthy society. However, even in the face of such divisive rhetoric, we must not lose sight of our belief in redemption. People are capable of change; they can learn from their mistakes and move towards a more thoughtful and nuanced understanding of complex issues. Rather than writing individuals off as irredeemable, we should encourage growth and dialogue. Let us advocate for an ethical approach to discussions, reject misleading narratives, and nurture the potential for transformation within ourselves and others. By doing so, we can work towards a more compassionate and understanding society, where truth thrives and meaningful engagement flourishes.
REMARKS BY PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP (Truth Social, February 19, 2025)
Consider this: ‘Volodymyr Zelenskyy, a moderately successful comedian.’(Truth Social, President Trump, 2/19/2025). This remark stands as a mere opinion, lacking factual basis, especially since President Trump himself is neither an artist, an art critic, nor a comedian. Even if one were to view Zelenskyy as an average comedian, what relevance does that hold for his capabilities as a politician? Such a statement is not only incongruous but also reflects a malicious intent.
On February 19, 2025, President Trump boldly claimed on Truth Social that Zelenskyy managed to convince the United States to commit $350 billion to a conflict he deemed unwinnable and completely unnecessary. He asserted that without the support of the U.S. and his own intervention, Zelenskyy would be incapable of resolving this crisis. This assertion, however, is not only misleading but also rooted in personal opinion and devoid of the evidence needed to substantiate such strong claims.
“A dictator without elections: Zelenskyy better move quickly, or he may not have a country left.” (Truth Social, President Trump, 2/19/2025). Martial Law in Ukraine: Decree No. 64/2022, issued by President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on February 24, 2022. According to the Ukrainian Constitution, national elections are not permitted during Martial Law.
“Czar Putin:” 24 Long Years in Power”
Why is Vladimir Putin still in power? | Britannica (Link)
Russia and Its Discontents
In Russia, dozens of dissenters are held as psychiatric patients | Reuters (Link)
Putin signs new laws to silence dissident voices in Russia (Link)
Russian Dissidents Stranded in Spain After Residency Requests Allegedly Denied – The Moscow Times (Link)
The Editor
Op-ed (January)
January 2025 Donald Trump: The Last Movie Star of “The Golden Era”
(A Literary Parody Crafted With Intent)
I believe Donald Trump is one of the most talented actors of our time. After watching his latest movie, “From Here to Eternity 2.0,” I feel compelled to defend him against the unjust criticisms and unfair judgments of his performance. Although it’s a fact that Trump lacks discipline and formal training—having risen to fame without stepping foot in an acting school—in “From Here to Eternity 2.0,” he exudes charm, energy, and inspiration. His unconventional style captivates audiences, and he impressively showcases his singing and dancing abilities. The cameras adore him, and he looks fantastic from every angle. He possesses a toughness that rivals John Wayne and a charisma that surpasses Marlon Brando. Trump has effectively proven that he is exceptional at “doing stuff” on camera, and that deserves recognition.
Trump’s critics, especially those within the art community, may possess keen insight and foresight, yet they often overlook key details. It’s important to recognize that their evaluation of films operates on a different level than that of the average viewer. My intention is to confront misleading arguments with clarity and logic. Furthermore, I want to emphasize that a hypothetical syllogism is a potentially valid argument, rather than a mere fallacy.
Opening Scene:
In this film, Trump delivers a captivating performance as a troubled and conflicted President. He truly deserves an Oscar for tackling such a demanding role. The opening scene thrusts us into the heart of the Ukraine-Russia War, skillfully establishing the tension and intrigue that our President-Hero will strive to navigate and ultimately escape.
“Chinese fighters captured by Ukraine speak out”
https://kyivindependent.com/everything-we-heard-from-russians-was-a-lie-chinese-fighters-captured-by-ukraine-speak-out/ (Link)
Next Scene:
Imagine a captivating 7-minute unbroken shot showcasing a vibrant tapestry of characters, each delivering powerful improvised verbal and non-verbal monologues at the southern border. The camera gracefully glides from one person to another, seamlessly transitioning from pitch to pitch, creating an immersive experience that draws the viewer in and evokes profound emotion.
“Southern border: Trump may impose Martial Law-type order on April 20”
https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/donald-trump-may-impose-martial-law-type-order-on-april-20-what-we-know-8162828 (Link)
Next Scene:
The glimpse into the Harvard University Campus is the perfect tone-setter for the mundane Higher Education resistance movement. Sometimes, simple resistance can be the best approach. For a film that addresses anti-democratic sentiments, it makes sense to spend some time focusing on the resistance beforehand.
“Harvard will fight Trump’s demands”
https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2025/4/15/harvard-denies-trump-demands (Link)
Next scene:
Omitted from the final cut, the film’s grand finale highlights a powerful dialogue among the President’s inner circle as they address a bustling street filled with people.
“Some Californians ‘irritated’ about Kamala Harris running for governor”
https://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/berkeley-poll-kamala-harris-governor-20277645.php (Link)
**************
In summary, it is highly recommended, warts and all.
The Editor
Inaugural Articles: Archived, Slingshot Digital Magazine, Fall 2024-2025
Copyright 2017-2026 ©Havah House Co. Policy Terms: the content of this website is a work of authorship and an intellectual property of Havah House Co. No portion of its content may be performed, reproduced, or used by any means, or disclosed to, quoted, or published in any medium without the consent of the owner.
Inaugural Articles: Archived, Slingshot Digital Magazine, Fall 2024-2025
Copyright 2017-2026 ©Havah House Co. Policy Terms: the content of this website is a work of authorship and an intellectual property of Havah House Co. No portion of its content may be performed, reproduced, or used by any means, or disclosed to, quoted, or published in any medium without the consent of the owner.