**********************************
****************************************
EDITOR: Havah – Christian, entrepreneur, journalist, and anthropologist
*************************************************
“News is what people don’t want you to print. Everything thing else is ads.”
William Randolph Hearst
*************************************
Legal Notice and Disclaimer
The content published on this website/News outlet is provided exclusively for informational and religious purposes and constitutes the sincerely held beliefs of the site’s operators, as protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, which guarantees the free exercise of religion and freedom of speech.
This website affirms a Christian viewpoint, specifically that the Bible is regarded as “the Book of the Prophets” and, in that sense, “the Word of the one and only God”.
For the purposes of this notice, we recognize that various individuals—including those outside the Christian faith—may interpret the Bible differently, whether as allegory, historical account, or otherwise. Nevertheless, we, the operators, receive the Bible as “prophetic Scripture” and as the governing spiritual authority—analogous to a constitution—for those who adhere to its teachings. These statements are made pursuant to our rights under the U.S. Constitution and are not intended, nor should they be construed, to deny the inherent dignity of any individual or to incite hatred, harassment, or unlawful discrimination.
By accessing or using this website, you acknowledge and accept that you may encounter religious opinions with which you disagree, and you do so voluntarily and at your own discretion, risk, and responsibility. Nothing contained herein shall be interpreted as waiving any rights, remedies, or protections afforded by law, nor as excluding any liability that cannot be lawfully waived or excluded.
********************************************
****************************************
Christian Values on the Ballot–But Who Represents Them?
With midterms upon us, the question arises: Do Christians shy away from political discourse? The answer is unequivocal–absolutely not. Christians are deeply engaged in the political process, representing a wide ideological spectrum from Republican to Independent to Democrat. In casting your vote, it is crucial to let your conscience–and not partisanship–be your guide. Yet, it must be acknowledged that neither President Trump nor President Biden genuinely reflects the core tenets of Christian values. The key takeaway: Be fully aware of the implications of your choice. Approach your vote with discernment, hold fast to your principles, and recognize the enduring impact of your voice.
************************************
Why Were the Polls Wrong About the First Election of FDR? It turned out, Roosevelt won 62% to 37%
1936. The Poll Predicted Defeat. Roosevelt Won in a Landslide. Taking the Polls with a Grain of Doubt.
**********************************************
****************************
Opinion
Midterms 2026—’Messengers Without a Message’
Republicans sell outrage as a governing philosophy; Democrats too often sell not being Republicans as a vision. Neither deserves a standing ovation for identifying the other’s bankruptcy. The public’s verdict is corrosive: 37% of Americans wish they had parties beyond these two to choose from—a market begging for something better than competing brands of disappointment. But let’s not manufacture an indifferent electorate to make the indictment easier: October’s NPR/PBS News/Marist poll finds 91% of Democratic likely voters, 86% of Republicans and 76% of independents enthusiastic about voting. The sharper question is whether enthusiasm for casting a ballot amounts to confidence in anyone receiving it. Showing up is not the same as believing; voting against someone is not a national purpose. My charge against both parties is not that they cannot attract an audience, but that they mistake an audience for a country renewed. Put politics in its place: a necessary instrument of public service, not a substitute religion, and certainly not a throne for our hopes. “Thy kingdom come” is a prayer—not a campaign slogan, and not a job opening either party can fill.
***************************************
Editorial
The 2026 Midterms: Lessons and Final Thoughts
Have a wonderful midterm season, everyone. God is in control. Cast your ballot, accept an honestly determined outcome, keep serving your neighbor—and remember that there is more to life than politics.
Whether Republicans or Democrats win the 2026 midterms, Christians should remember that our hope is not in any candidate running for office. Elections matter because policies affect our reality, but the outcome does not determine whether God remains faithful—or whether we continue loving our neighbors, speaking truth, and living with courage—even if our neighbor voted for the ‘opposition’.
Consider the world in which Jesus ministered. He began and completed his public ministry under Roman imperial power, not a government committed to “Christian principles”. Luke 3:1 names the authorities: Emperor Tiberius, Pontius Pilate governing Judea, and Herod Antipas ruling Galilee. Antipas—not Herodotus—ruled throughout Jesus’ ministry; Pilate, Rome’s Prefect from AD 26 to 36, ultimately ordered his crucifixion. Neither imperial power nor hostile rulers prevented Christ from fulfilling his mission.
Why, then, should we behave as though God’s purposes depend on our party controlling Congress?
After the ballots are counted, we can continue with the same faith and optimism for two reasons.
First, our security rests in God’s care—no one can touch us unless God allows it. According to Job, evil can only occur with God’s permission. Do we believe that? Absolutely—and if you don’t, we’ll pray for you (and perhaps suggest you look up ‘fear,’ since it’s not in our vocabulary). Psalm 91:7 says, “A thousand shall fall at thy side, and ten thousand at thy right hand; but it shall not come near thee.” Jesus also promised, “But there shall not a hair of your head perish” (Luke 21:18). However, just two verses earlier, Jesus warned that some of His followers would be killed. Ultimately, if evil wants to reach us, it must first ‘get through’ God’s protection.
Second, our confidence does not depend on what the electoral map looks like. As the apostle Paul wrote, “For we walk by faith, not by sight” (2 Corinthians 5:7). That is right: by faith—not by polling or partisan panic. Let us therefore accept the results of a fair election with humility. Investigate credible concerns through lawful processes, certainly—but do not declare an election “stolen” merely because our side lost. Nor should we confuse peaceful dissent with rebellion or brand political opponents as ‘satanic’. Goethe’s Mephistopheles calls himself “the spirit that negates”; Christians should resist making reflexive denial their own political identity. Our response should be truthful and constructive.
Have a wonderful midterm season, everyone. God is in control. Cast your ballot, accept an honestly determined outcome, and keep serving your neighbor.
*************************************
*******************************************************
Midterms 2026
YOUTUBE (Link)
********************************************
MIDTERMS 2026
The government—Congress, the White House, and the Supreme Court—does not really “earn” the money it spends. Remember whose money is at stake and demand accountability
*****************************************
Midterms 2026 | Party Time!
Top tunes to set the stage for a winning (or not) political party celebration! (Link)
**********************************************
Early Voting Surges Past 52 Million for 2026 General Election
YOUTUBE (Link)
Voters nationwide had returned a total of 52,318,465 advance ballots in the 2026 general election, pushing early voting past 52 million as participation surged in key Senate battlegrounds. About 210 million Americans are registered to vote, so that early voting total represents roughly 25% of registered voters—not more than 50% of Americans. More than 100 million people are expected to vote overall, but the final turnout will not be known until after the November 3 election. (Reuters/AP)
**********************************************
Pope Leo XIV Goes Postal: Vatican Confirms Pontiff Mailed Ballot to Chicago for Midterms 2026
Chicago’s Pope Makes History: Leo XIV to Cast Ballot in 2026 U.S. Midterms
History in the making: Pope Leo XIV, the Chicago-born leader of the Catholic Church, is set to become the first sitting pope to cast a vote in a U.S. election—requesting a mail-in ballot for the midterms. The Will County clerk confirms the pontiff’s registration in Illinois, marking a milestone for American Christians and the global church alike. (Via The Chicago Sun-Times)
Registered as Robert F. Prevost, Pope Leo XIV has, for years, listed a family home in Will County near Chicago as his address. The Will County Clerk’s Office confirmed to CBS News that he appears on the list of voters who requested a mail-in ballot, using a registered address in New Lenox.
*******************************************
Rev. Al Sharpton, Political Activist and Baptist Minister, Detroit
********************************************
Evangelist Franklin Graham, President and CEO of Samaritan’s Purse and the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association
****************************************
Rev. Paula White-Cain is an American Pastor, author, and televangelist. White is a spiritual advisor to Donald Trump (2026). She served as chair of the evangelical advisory board to Donald Trump 2026 presidential campaign. White delivered the invocation at Trump’s first inauguration on January 20, 2017, becoming the first female clergy member to deliver an inaugural invocation.
YOUTUBE (Link)
EDITORIAL: Consider the world in which Jesus ministered. He began and completed his public ministry under Roman imperial power, not a government committed to “Christian principles”. Luke 3:1 names the authorities: Emperor Tiberius, Pontius Pilate governing Judea, and Herod Antipas ruling Galilee. Antipas—not Herodotus—ruled throughout Jesus’ ministry; Pilate, Rome’s Prefect from AD 26 to 36, ultimately ordered his crucifixion. Neither imperial power nor hostile rulers prevented Christ from fulfilling his mission.
OPINION: All ministers, political leaders, and earthly authorities exist within God’s will and deserve respect. God’s ministers—including Charlie Kirk—are imperfect, as we all are. Our purpose is not to condemn them, but to remind readers that Jesus never directly aligned Himself with a governmental ruler; Jesus referred to Herod Antipas as “that fox.” May God bless His ministers for their outstanding work in sharing their faith and warning against Marxism. Reading Marx alongside the anthropologist Lewis H. Morgan, whose work influenced Marx (profoundly), informs our conviction that Marx and Lenin transformed noble concerns about property and civil rights into a morally destructive apparatus of state control. Un-be-liev-able: Anthropologist Morgan was a staunch capitalist and an active Republican state assemblyman and senator—yet his academic work became a foundation for global socialist movements. From a Christian perspective, this is a tragic irony: those movements, embraced by Marx, Engels, and Lenin, used his ethnographic research on “primitive communism” to influence the development of the modern state apparatus and the concept of private property. In this respect, most Democrats appear to be misinformed—“saints marching in” (full of good intentions), largely unaware of these filtered precepts and attracted to “light socialism” by its apparent appeal. Conversely, some predatory Republicans have never even opened the Bible—how can anyone argue against something they don’t know? “Ignorance itself is without a doubt a sin for those who do not wish to understand; for those who, however, cannot understand, it is the punishment of sin.” (St. Augustine of Hippo).
In this respect, we commend Rev. Paula White-Cain. And whether she supports the sitting President is a matter for her conscience, just as his decisions remain his responsibility.
Despite our disagreements, we wish her well and recognize her remarkable spiritual work and insight. Rev. Paula White-Cain is discerning and spiritually alert, with well-grounded beliefs, firmly rooted convictions, and with remarkable intellectual clarity. Our differences should never eclipse Christian charity or the need for spiritual discernment in a world too often marked by spiritual blindness.
************************************************
Midterms 2026
***********************************************
Midterms 2026
YOUTUBE: Muslim Brotherhood: What is it? (Link)
Does Dr. Abdul El-Sayed, the Democratic nominee in the 2026 U.S. Senate election in Michigan and a practicing Muslim, have any connection to the “Muslim Brotherhood”?
EDITORIAL: At this time, there is no factual or legal basis to assert that Dr. Abdul El-Sayed is a Muslim Brotherhood member or operative. Any further action or public statement must comply with constitutional protections, including the First Amendment and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, and must avoid unwarranted religious or political discrimination. Nevertheless, legal formalism should not obscure the reality: verifiable facts underlie certain aspects of this controversy, and responsible voters should examine them with due seriousness, consistent with the constitutional guarantee of due process under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, which require that any consideration of facts in legal or public proceedings be based on objective, reliable evidence.
The United States Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Michigan has returned a federal indictment charging Mariam Muhammed Odeh, age 24 and a resident of Dearborn, Michigan, previously employed as an hourly campaign organizer for U.S. Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed, as one of twelve defendants alleged to have engaged in a criminal conspiracy. Specifically, the indictment alleges that Odeh and her co-defendants willfully and knowingly participated in a scheme constituting a violation of federal criminal statutes prohibiting threats, intimidation, and the malicious destruction of property. The alleged conduct, occurring between October 2023 and April 2024, is purported to have targeted University of Michigan administrators, sworn law enforcement officers, and community organizations, including the Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Detroit. These charges, if proven beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law, implicate not only federal criminal statutes but may also trigger constitutional considerations under the First Amendment (regarding the limits of protected speech) and the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause, as well as due process protections under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. The presumption of innocence attaches to all defendants until they are proven guilty, as required by the Constitution of the United States.
Historical records indicate that Islamic expansion, often involving military campaigns and instances of forced conversion, preceded the Christian Crusades by several centuries. According to historian Hugh Kennedy, the rapid spread of Islam in the 7th and 8th centuries involved the conquest of vast territories across the Middle East, North Africa, and parts of Europe (Kennedy, 2007). Christian chroniclers of the medieval period frequently cited these expansions as a principal justification for launching the Crusades, framing them as defensive responses to earlier aggression (Riley-Smith, 1997).
The following are reasons why Christians are regarded as ‘blasphemous’ from an Islamist (Muslim) perspective:
- The doctrine of the Trinity: God as Father, Son (Jesus), and Holy Spirit—regarded as ‘blasphemous’.
- The belief that Jesus is both God and the Son of God—viewed as ‘idolatry’.
- The doctrine that Christ died for humanity’s sins—Islamic teaching holds that no individual can bear the ‘sins’ of another.
- The Prophet Muhammad instructed that men and women pray in separate rows during congregational prayer, with men in the front rows and women positioned behind them.
President Trump’s administration formally designated specific Middle Eastern chapters of the Muslim Brotherhood as terrorist organizations on January 13, 2026, following an executive order signed on 11/ 24, 2025.
*********************************************
Opinion
****************************************
Midterms 2026
*******************************************
Opinion
Lies, Damned Lies, and Little White Lies Before God
Christians Face Crucial Ballot Issues: “There’s No Confusion”—The Issues Are Clear and So Is the Bible on Same-Sex Marriage and Abortion
A Christian response to abortion and same-sex partnerships must begin with compassion, not party loyalty; every person bears God’s image (Genesis 1:27). In Texas’s Senate race, Republican Ken Paxton reflects the religious position against both abortion and same-sex marriage, while Democrat James Talarico supports abortion rights, grounding his stance in the biblical call to love one’s neighbor (Matthew 22:39). Christians who oppose abortion and affirm marriage as between a man and a woman often reference Psalm 139:13–16 and Matthew 19:4–6. Others, like James Talarico, emphasize inclusion and carefully distinguish their religious convictions from the laws governing society.
Ethical Christian engagement demands more than religious rhetoric from candidates; it calls us to protect vulnerable life and to build a society that reveres the birth of every child—not merely as an act of bringing children into the world, but as welcoming children of God. In a society where mothers are truly cared for, abortion becomes less likely—not through compulsion, but because the sacredness of life is recognized from an early age. Regarding same-sex partnerships, while the Bible does not support them, Christians must remember that ultimate judgment belongs to God alone. We cannot presume to know the final outcome for any soul—perhaps there will be same-sex partners in “heaven” and straight partners in “hell”. If you are “not” playing God, then this too is possible. Our calling is clear: to support pregnant women and families, to reject cruelty toward LGBTQ people, and to judge every candidate by honesty, justice, mercy, and humility—not merely by party affiliation (Micah 6:8).
************************************************
Opinion
Midterms 2026: “There’s No Confusion”—Don’t Just Elect Christians; Protect the Sanctity of ‘Marriage’ as ‘Cohabitation’ Surges
As the November 3, 2026, midterms approach, vote for Christian candidates—they don’t have to be perfect or saints—but whose policies protect the sanctity of marriage, and whose concrete policies reflect not just “Christian” but “Biblical” values—not merely those who claim the label. Let reducing divorce be a goal, not an unsupported promise that electing Christians will accomplish it. Our society is accepting “cohabitation” instead of marriage at alarming rates. And yet, we understand that in an abusive relationship, marriage may be dissolved. Surely, Christian or not, when marriage is on the rocks, one must spend less energy assigning blame and more on honesty. A Christian marriage is a covenant—not a guarantee against storms. When intimacy fades, seek God’s guidance, a qualified marriage counselor, a trusted pastor, and wise friends. Prayer and practical action belong in the same lifeboat.
Faith alone does not make couples immune to divorce. Barna’s 2025 U.S. findings reported that 16% of practicing Christians, 20% of nonpracticing Christians, and 16% of non-Christians said they had experienced divorce. These are shares of adults reporting divorce—not percentages of marriages that end in divorce. Cohabitation: A frequently cited 2023 survey reported figures of 65% for Millennials and 35% for Gen Z, but it surveyed only unmarried people currently in relationships—not all members of either generation. (Census Bureau’s 2025)
******************************************
Opinion
Midterms 2026: Republicans and Democrats, Spare Us the Sermons—Show Us Sexual Harassment Law Protections
In the 2026 midterms, the real test for Republicans and Democrats is not what they promise—it is whom they protect. Will they make protection against sexual harassment a legislative priority, or let partisan gridlock stand in the way? Every person bears God’s image. Protecting their dignity demands more than campaign rhetoric. Voters deserve concrete laws, clear enforcement plans, and real accountability. Neither party deserves credit for platitudes. Candidates must show how they will close gaps in protection, support survivors, and hold offenders accountable. Faith calls us to seek justice—not merely speak of it.
SEXUAL HARASSMENT AND RESTRAINING ORDERS
Restraining orders make the stakes plain. A court order must be more than a piece of paper. People facing harassment, threats, or stalking need accessible legal remedies, swift court action, and enforcement that works. A bureaucratic box checked is not a person protected. Press every candidate: How will you make restraining orders effective, impose meaningful consequences on violators, and uphold due process? Loving our neighbors means taking their safety seriously. Justice requires action.
***************************************
| Sexual Harassment | “There’s No Confusion,” and the Law Is Clear: “No” Means “No”
*************************************************
Opinion
Democrats and Republicans: ‘Thou Shalt Not Steal’ Has No Online Exception—Midterms 2026, Cyberstalking, and Private Banking Theft
In the 2026 midterms, demand accountability: protecting private citizens’ bank accounts, computers, and identities is a basic duty—not a partisan favor. Cyberstalkers and identity thieves threaten both financial security and personal freedom. The FBI investigates cybercrime, collects reports through IC3.gov, issues security alerts, and supports efforts to recover stolen funds—but cannot guarantee recovery. Both Democrats and Republicans should strengthen privacy protections, require stronger financial safeguards, fund cybercrime investigations, and deliver faster help for victims without expanding unchecked surveillance. Federal consequences can be severe: retrieving information from a private citizen’s bank account and committing bank fraud can result in up to 30 years in prison and a $1 million fine, while qualifying aggravated identity theft adds a mandatory two-year prison term to the underlying felony sentence. Privacy deserves protection, victims deserve action, and criminals—not citizens—should pay the price.
No Digital Loophole, No Congressional Exemption: Federal Law Applies
Thou shalt not steal’ has no digital loophole—and a congressional title is no exemption. Breaking into someone’s online bank account to obtain financial information can bring federal charges under 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(2), with up to one year for a basic first offense or up to five years when felony conditions, such as financial gain, apply. Cyberstalking that meets federal legal requirements can bring up to five years under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2261A and 2261(b), with higher penalties for serious injury or death; DOJ has secured an actual five-year sentence for cyberstalking. God calls for repentance; federal prosecutors can seek prison.
***************************************
INTERNATIONAL
***
***************************************************
Israel Election | 2026
**********************************
Blessed are the Peacemakers.
Israelis and Palestinians, make your peace while you can. The prospect of Iran developing a nuclear bomb raises the terrifying danger of a conflict that could threaten humanity. We urge you both: think of your children, your neighbors, and the rest of the world. Make peace before catastrophe makes the choice for you.
“You can’t make war without Egypt, and you can’t make peace without Syria.” Henry Kissinger
***********************************************
**************************************************
******************************************************
Editorial | Brazil’s Presidential Election 2026
Bolsonaro’s Opponent: The Charismatic Union Leader Who Became a Champion of Marxist-Style State Intervention
IN 2017, PRESIDENT “LULA” WAS CONVICTED OF CORRUPTION AND SENTENCED TO PRISON. HE SERVED 580 DAYS BEHIND BARS BEFORE THE CONVICTION WAS LATER ANNULLED ON PROCEDURAL GROUNDS (2021)–“CURITIBA” COURT “LACKED JURISDICTION”. AND YET, THE FINAL RULING DID NOT DECLARE LULA INNOCENT.
One positive aspect of Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva’s early career was his emergence as a working-class trade-union leader rather than a doctrinaire Marxist intellectual. His political roots lay in the automobile and metalworking industries of São Paulo’s ABC industrial region—comparable, as an industrial analogy, to Detroit’s place in American manufacturing—where he led major strikes in the late 1970s and helped found the Workers’ Party in 1980. BBC reporting and a University of North Carolina Press historical account document this background and his resistance to Brazil’s military dictatorship. Nevertheless, along the way, he became an opinionated and indoctrinated Marxist; therefore, we strongly oppose his government’s political direction. From our Christian and pro-market perspective, our objection is to a governing approach that we believe places excessive confidence in state intervention and government-administered benefits rather than fiscal responsibility, private initiative, innovation, and independent civil society. Concerns about fiscal sustainability are substantive: Atlantic Council analysis identifies Brazil’s heavy public debt and large deficits as major economic challenges. We therefore reject Lula’s political project—not because we dismiss his working-class roots, but because we believe his governing priorities undermine the fiscal discipline, private initiative, and independent civil society that Brazil needs.
*****************************************
Opinion
**************************************************
***************************
Opinion | Road to the Presidency in 2030 (The Saga of Flavio Bolsonaro)
Silence is not surrender (A Biblical example that inspires us): “Falsely accused of adultery, Joseph left his defense to God—and God didn’t stop at vindication; He also bestowed honor.”
For the record, as a point of biblical comparison, just about everyone knew about Potiphar and his wife’s ‘little secret’—except, of course, Potiphar and his wife. They thought their lie and shame were safely buried, but the truth had already made the rounds. The only people buying their story were the two selling it. And all this, mind you, happened before “restraining orders” were even invented.
Not every accusation deserves an answer. Not every provocation deserves a platform. When accusations descend into absurdity, obsession, and vendetta, silence is not surrender. Sometimes it is the refusal to let your accusers dictate your conduct. In our view, Flávio Bolsonaro has been unjustly accused, and the campaign against him reflects political persecution rather than impartial justice. We see corruption and political hostility in the conduct of Lula’s government and the Supreme Court establishment. Those are our judgments—and we believe Bolsonaro is right not to dignify every attack with a reply. A shouting match does not become a search for truth merely because its participants wear robes or hold office.
For Christians, the model is not the loudest voice in the room. It is Christ. Isaiah describes His suffering this way: “He was oppressed, and he was afflicted, yet he opened not his mouth” (Isaiah 53:7, KJV). The passage compares Him to a lamb led to slaughter—a picture of restraint under injustice, not an admission of guilt. That is the force of the lamb’s example: gentleness is not guilt, and restraint is not weakness. Faith does not need to win a shouting contest to remain faith.
Consider Joseph. Falsely accused of adultery by his master’s wife; he was imprisoned for an offense he had refused to commit. Genesis records the accusation and his imprisonment, but it does not record a defense from Joseph in that scene. Before the accusation, his refusal had already revealed his deepest allegiance: “How then can I do this great wickedness, and sin against God?” (Genesis 39:9, KJV). His conscience answered to God before it answered to a master’s household. Joseph’s story reminds us that an accusation can change a person’s circumstances without changing the truth. The prison did not make him guilty. His accuser’s influence did not make her honest. And Genesis tells us that, even there, “The Lord was with Joseph.” (Genesis 39:21, KJV)
Christians must also resist a second temptation: turning the desire for justice into an appetite for revenge. Jesus said, “Love your enemies,” and commanded His followers to “pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you” (Matthew 5:44, KJV). Paul makes the boundary equally clear: “Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord” (Romans 12:19, KJV). Justice belongs to God; personal vengeance does not belong to us. We pray for our enemies, therefore, not as a theatrical warning that God will destroy them, but because Christ commands us to love them. Leaving judgment to God means leaving it there—not drafting His verdict for Him.
“The fear of the Lord—not of humans—is the beginning of wisdom.” (The Book of Proverbs)
Pharaoh’s story—likely that of Ramses II (Ramesses, The Great)—offers a sobering warning about the dangers of unchecked power. Exodus records that the catastrophe reached even Pharaoh’s household: his firstborn died alongside the other firstborn of Egypt. Political authority could not insulate him from the consequences described in that account. That is reason for humility before God, not permission to announce a particular punishment upon today’s political opponents.
Our opinion is that Bolsonaro is protecting his family and waiting for a just government and a fair process to clear his name. We regard that restraint not as an admission, but as a refusal to make his family’s life a permanent courtroom performance. Let the evidence be examined. Let the proceedings be fair. Let accusations meet scrutiny rather than applause. And let no one confuse the refusal to answer every attack with the absence of an answer. A person can decline the spectacle without conceding the case.
******************************************************
October 25, 2026 | Brazil’s Presidential Election
We Offer Our Congratulations to the Next President of Brazil—And pray that his leadership will be worthy of Brazil’s trust (2027-2030)
**********************************************************
************************
Brazil’s Presidential Election 2026
The Real Story Behind Bolsonaro-JD Vance’s, Campaign Cash: Scandal or Strategy? A Campaign Contribution, Not a Down Payment
One Nation, Under the Influence—Please Make Checks Payable to Principle
As of October 28, 2026, Brazil’s Supreme Court has ordered police to investigate whether the Rockbridge Network, co-founded by JD Vance, provided prohibited foreign financing or other support to Flávio Bolsonaro’s presidential campaign. The central implication is potential foreign interference: investigators are examining whether contacts involved money, services, personnel, or other economically valuable assistance—not merely shared political views. This is an investigation, not a finding of wrongdoing; Rockbridge denies involvement, and the cited reporting does not establish that Vance personally directed campaign assistance. The clearest sources are The Washington Post’s October 27 report and NOTUS’s October 28 account, which describes Justice Flávio Dino’s 38-page order.
Giving legally to a political candidate you believe in can be an honorable act of citizenship; giving enough to expect a politician on speed dial is another matter. Political scientists Martin Gilens and Benjamin Page, studying 1,779 policy issues, found that economic elites and business interest groups exerted substantial independent influence on U.S. policy, while average citizens had little or none—a sobering picture of whose voice gets heard. For Christians, the question is not just whether a donation clears the legal bar, but whether it serves our neighbors or buys power over them: democracy should not come with a VIP subscription.
Enormous political gifts are not automatically criminal—direct contributions to federal candidates face legal limits—but “technically legal” is a remarkably low ceiling for Christian ethics. From a Christian perspective, integrity matters more than victory: in life, politics, and business, winning through sin is not success but spiritual defeat.
- In life, a victory purchased with dishonesty or cruelty impoverishes the soul: “For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?” (Mark 8:36, KJV).
- In politics, no election victory excuses lies, oppression, or the betrayal of the vulnerable; Scripture declares, “Woe unto them that decree unrighteous decrees” (Isaiah 10:1, KJV).
- In business, profit earned by cheating workers or deceiving customers is not a blessing to celebrate but a sin to repent of: “A false balance is abomination to the LORD: but a just weight is his delight” (Proverbs 11:1, KJV).
“Integrity” Matters More Than “Victory”
(So the Bible is “allegory”. Did a Rabbi/Talmudic Scholar explain that or did your bestie discover metaphor between bong hits?)
The Christian calling is not to win at any cost. It is to walk uprightly, even when the crooked road looks faster. Slowly, steadily, in God’s timing. Better an honest delay than a dishonest arrival. The fear of the Lord means remembering whose approval matters when the applause gets loud. You can fool a crowd, polish your reputation, and even put a Bible verse in your bio. God is not checking your branding. So read your Bible in your spare time—and let it interrupt your plans, not just decorate them. If winning requires abandoning your integrity, congratulations: you’ve lost with excellent publicity.
********************************************
**********************************
U.S. Senate Drama: Majority Isn’t Enough to Impeach Trump
Impeachment Looms for Trump. “Removal” Is the Real Question.
Projection: President Trump is likely to remain in office for the rest of his term. In fact, the latest data from Pew, Gallup, and the Cook Political Report suggest that, if current trends continue, the GOP’s return to the White House in 2028 appears less a possibility and more an inevitability.
** BAMBOOZLED BY A MIRAGE: A Statehood bill would have to become law before the new state could supply those senators: Both the House and Senate would need to pass it; Senate supporters would need to overcome a filibuster under the usual rules or change the applicable procedure; a simple-majority final vote alone does not solve that obstacle; The president would need to sign it—or Congress would need to override a veto by two-thirds votes in both chambers. Winning narrow congressional majorities would not bypass that requirement ** (Article IV’s Admission’s Clause & the 23rd Amendment).
**********************************
****************************
**********************************
*************************
***********************************************
********************************
****************************
****************
Are Democrats just like Republicans? If the “methods” are the same, do the “ideals” still matter?
“If Democrats gain control of Congress, will they treat opposition as a necessary part of democracy—or an obstacle to power? The moral test of a majority is not whether it can punish its opponents, but whether it can distinguish justice from revenge.”
***************************************
**********************
Projection 2026
Democrats Projected to Take House by Narrow Margin in 2026 Midterms–A ‘Narrow’ Democratic House Win Would Raise Questions About the Party’s Message
*************************************
*****************************
Opinion
America 2046
*********************************************
***************************
Midterms 2026
What Matters Most to American Voters in 2026?
As Christians, we believe God owns all the riches of the world—the silver and the gold. Those riches do not make politicians our saviors. Nor does God’s sovereignty grant them exemption from accountability. Our faith calls us to pursue a future that is just for everyone, not merely comfortable for the well-connected. Prosperity that leaves struggling families behind is a poor reflection of justice. Choose your candidates wisely and carefully. Examine their records, their priorities, and whom their policies actually serve. A Bible in a campaign photo is not a character reference. Pray with faith. Vote with discernment. And stop mistaking promises for provision.
***********************************
******************
Midterms 2026
Christians or Not–Vote Your Conscience, Not Misinformation
When donors, campaign operatives, or public officials knowingly spread falsehoods, Christians should condemn such conduct without hesitation. Political victory cannot cleanse deliberate deception. Invoking God while bearing false witness does not sanctify a campaign; it profanes the faith it claims to defend. We must also distinguish between forceful criticism and manipulation. The key question is whether an accusation rests on verifiable facts and sound reasoning, or substitutes insults, fear, and personal smears for evidence. Evaluate candidates by their records, public conduct, policy positions, competence, and willingness to answer legitimate questions. Do not mistake a religious label for moral character, a polished performance for honesty, or a large campaign budget for credibility.
Christians who take prayer and Scripture seriously should be especially wary of pride, greed, cruelty, and deceit—including within their own political camp. Our responsibility is not to pronounce strangers damned or pretend we can see into their souls. Instead, our responsibility is to recognize wrongdoing when the evidence establishes it, name it plainly, and refuse to participate. No party owns the Gospel. No fortune places its owner beyond accountability. No Christian should excuse a lie simply because it serves a favored cause.
**********************************************
*********************************
Midterms 2026
Social Activism 2.0
“TIK TOK SOCIAL ACTIVISM”
TikTok social activism can be deeply harmful to society when it values public approval over genuine love, truth, and service. The pressure to appear righteous Midterms can turn important causes into performances, encouraging people to shame others rather than approach them with humility and compassion. Jesus warned against practicing righteousness merely to be seen by others, a teaching that challenges activism motivated by likes, followers, and praise (Matthew 6:1). When users share accusations without seeking the truth or treat disagreement as a reason for hatred, they abandon the Christian call to speak truthfully and love their neighbors. Although TikTok can be used to raise awareness about injustice, Christians should reject activism that promotes violence and division, choosing instead service rooted in honesty, mercy, and a willingness to help people beyond the screen.
************************************************
********************************
Midterms 2026
********************************
****************************
Midterms 2026
***********************************
**************************
Midterms 2026
****************************
Historical Research
Islamic Militaristic Expansion Preceded the Crusades: A Historical Perspective
Historical records indicate that Islamic expansion, often involving military campaigns and instances of forced conversion, preceded the Christian Crusades by several centuries. According to historian Hugh Kennedy, the rapid spread of Islam in the 7th and 8th centuries involved the conquest of vast territories across the Middle East, North Africa, and parts of Europe (Kennedy, 2007). Christian chroniclers of the medieval period frequently cited these expansions as a principal justification for launching the Crusades, framing them as defensive responses to earlier aggression (Riley-Smith, 1997).
The following are reasons why Christians are regarded as ‘blasphemous’ from an Islamist (Muslim) perspective:
- The doctrine of the Trinity: God as Father, Son (Jesus), and Holy Spirit—regarded as ‘blasphemous’.
- The belief that Jesus is both God and the Son of God—viewed as ‘idolatry’.
- The doctrine that Christ died for humanity’s sins—Islamic teaching holds that no individual can bear the ‘sins’ of another.
References:
- Kennedy, H. (2007). The Great Arab Conquests: How the Spread of Islam Changed the World We Live In. Da Capo Press.
- Riley-Smith, J. (1997). The First Crusaders, 1095-1131. Cambridge University Press.
- Tyerman, C. (2006). God’s War: A New History of the Crusades. Harvard University Press.
- Madden, T. F. (2014). The Concise History of the Crusades. Rowman & Littlefield.
***
Founding Father Thomas Jefferson Sounds the Alarm: America’s Father of Archaeology Warned of Islamic Religious Extremism
Thomas Jefferson is often called the “father of American archaeology” because of his systematic excavation of a Native American burial mound in Virginia
***************************************
**************************
Midterms 2026
‘Dark Maga’
**********************************
**********************
Opinion | Silicon Valley, The Day After (1990s-2026)
Tech Giants? Hell No. Just Technocrats (With a Few Exceptions) Building the Road to Hell
Innovation deserves examination, not worship. When technocrats celebrate their latest ventures, we are entitled to ask: Who benefits? Who bears the costs? Does this work address genuine human needs, or does it primarily enlarge the wealth and influence of those already at the top? Hunger, poverty, and human suffering must not become mere background scenery for the rich’s self-congratulation.
******************************************
***************************
*************************************************
THEN AND NOW (Banksy) (Link)
On October 5, 2018, Banksy stunned the world when his artwork “Girl with Balloon” shredded itself just after being sold at Sotheby’s for £1.04 million ($1.4 million).
*******************************
NOW AND THEN (2026)
***********************************
***********************************
Opinion
****************************
********************
Midterms 2026
*************************************
***************************
Memory Lane
************************
********************
“The world relies upon, and America must rely upon, a strong military.” (Mitt Romney)
****************************************
******************************
“In digital era, privacy must be a priority. Is it just me, or is secret blanket surveillance obscenely outrageous?” (Al Gore)
**********************
**********
EDITOR’S NOTE
Statement of Editorial Integrity and Reservation of Rights
As a Christian editor, we are committed to ensuring that all data and information presented on this subject reflect the highest standards of accuracy and integrity. All statements, statistics, and analyses contained herein are supported by verifiable sources and conform to the highest standards of journalistic ethics and applicable law. Any insinuation or allegation that this publication constitutes propaganda is expressly and categorically denied as false. We expressly reserve all rights and remedies available under applicable law, including, without limitation, the right to pursue legal action for defamation arising from any actionable misrepresentation of this publication or defamatory attack upon the integrity of its content. Our editorial position remains grounded in truth, transparency, and the principles of responsible reporting. This reservation extends only to statements satisfying the applicable requirements for legal liability and does not purport to restrict lawful criticism, protected opinion, or other constitutionally protected expression.
In our capacity as a Christian editor, we affirm our commitment to the accuracy, integrity, and evidentiary foundation of the material presented herein. All factual representations, statistical assertions, and analytical conclusions are supported by verifiable sources and are presented in accordance with applicable law and the ethical obligations of responsible journalism. Our Christian convictions inform this editorial commitment; they do not displace the obligation to distinguish substantiated fact from opinion, inference, or interpretation.
This publication is a specialized journalistic outlet (e.g. Car Magazine, Golf Magazine) with an expressly defined editorial focus, analogous in scope and selectivity to a publication devoted to automobiles or another particular subject. In the exercise of its editorial judgment, this publication elects to afford greater emphasis and coverage to individuals whom it supports, while providing selected information concerning other individuals insofar as that information is relevant to its stated editorial interests. Such selection and emphasis do not constitute a representation that this publication provides comprehensive or equal coverage of every individual, position, or competing perspective, nor do they diminish its stated commitment to factual accuracy and transparent sourcing. Readers seeking more extensive coverage of other individuals or perspectives are encouraged to consult additional news outlets and sources. This publication’s editorial interests are expressly disclosed; access to and use of this website are voluntary, and readers remain responsible for exercising independent judgment in evaluating its content. Nothing in this statement shall be construed to waive any reader’s rights or to relieve this publication of any obligation imposed by applicable law.
Nothing herein shall be construed as a waiver of any substantive or procedural right. The governing editorial commitment remains the accurate presentation of verifiable information, the transparent identification of its evidentiary basis, and adherence to the principles of responsible reporting.
For full disclosure of our terms and policies, please contact our legal department by emailing the webmaster.
Webmaster: info (at) havahhouseco (dot) com
************************************
INTERNATIONAL
Opinion | Road to the Presidency in 2030
2030 Presidential Election in Brazil—Brazil’s Christian Party: Reorganize the Base (Link)
The Christian community’s work in Brazil does not end at the ballot box. May Christians continue praying, serving their neighbors, upholding the dignity of every person, and speaking truth with grace. Christian faith should shape conduct—not depend on an election result. May Brazil have peaceful elections, a strong democracy, and the wisdom to disagree without forgetting how to love. May God bless Brazil.
*************************************************
BRAZIL
Michelle Bolsonaro: From Senate Victory (2026) to 2030?
Michelle Bolsonaro was Elected to an 8-year Term in the Brazilian Federal Senate Representing the Federal District
Michelle Bolsonaro is a committed Evangelical Christian who places faith at the center of her message. While her husband and stepsons sometimes invoke religion for political purposes, Michelle consistently grounds her approach in authentic Christian beliefs. Her agenda emphasizes Christian views on gender roles, upholds the values of the Christian family, and firmly opposes abortion. She presents her entry into politics not as a quest for personal power, but as a calling to bring faith-based values into government.
***********************
INTERNATIONAL
October 25, 2026 | Brazil’s Presidential Election
We Offer Our Congratulations to the Next President of Brazil—And pray that his leadership will be worthy of Brazil’s trust (2027-2030)
“Cheers to Brazil’s democratic elections.” (Link)
We initially projected a Flávio Bolsonaro victory (primarily) because several major final polls—including Datafolha, commissioned by Folha de S.Paulo and Globo; Quaest; and AtlasIntel/Bloomberg—placed him narrowly ahead of Lula. Datafolha and Quaest each showed 51% to 49%, while AtlasIntel showed 50.8% to 49.2%. As our company and data center continue to grow, we plan to conduct our own independent data polling surveys in the future.
**********************
***************************************************
***************************************************
EDITORIAL
Bolsonaro’s Opponent: The Charismatic Union Leader Who Became a Champion of Marxist-Style State Intervention
One positive aspect of Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva’s early career was his emergence as a working-class trade-union leader rather than a doctrinaire Marxist intellectual. His political roots lay in the automobile and metalworking industries of São Paulo’s ABC industrial region—comparable, as an industrial analogy, to Detroit’s place in American manufacturing—where he led major strikes in the late 1970s and helped found the Workers’ Party in 1980. BBC reporting and a University of North Carolina Press historical account document this background and his resistance to Brazil’s military dictatorship. Nevertheless, along the way, he became an opinionated and indoctrinated Marxist; therefore, we strongly oppose his government’s political direction. From our Christian and pro-market perspective, our objection is to a governing approach that we believe places excessive confidence in state intervention and government-administered benefits rather than fiscal responsibility, private initiative, innovation, and independent civil society. Concerns about fiscal sustainability are substantive: Atlantic Council analysis identifies Brazil’s heavy public debt and large deficits as major economic challenges. We therefore reject Lula’s political project—not because we dismiss his working-class roots, but because we believe his governing priorities undermine the fiscal discipline, private initiative, and independent civil society that Brazil needs.
*********************************************
**************************************************
************************************************
******************************************
*****************************************************************
INTERNATIONAL | BRAZIL
Michelle Bolsonaro was Elected to an 8-year Term in the Brazilian Federal Senate Representing the Federal District
**********************************************
****************************
Copyright 2026 ©Havah House Co. Policy Terms: the content of this website is a work of authorship and an intellectual property of Havah House Co. No portion of its content may be performed, reproduced, or used by any means, or disclosed to, quoted, or published in any medium without the consent of the owner.